<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1687-1812-2010-547828</ui>
   <ji>1687-1812</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research Article</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Convergence of Paths for Perturbed Maximal Monotone Mappings in Hilbert Spaces</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1"><snm>Qing</snm><fnm>Yuan</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>yuanqingbuaa@hotmail.com</email></au>
            <au id="A2"><snm>Qin</snm><fnm>Xiaolong</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>ljjhqxl@yahoo.com.cn</email></au>
            <au id="A3"><snm>Zhou</snm><fnm>Haiyun</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>witman66@yahoo.cn</email></au>
            <au id="A4" ca="yes"><snm>Kang</snm><fnm>ShinMin</fnm><insr iid="I3"/><email>smkang@gnu.ac.kr</email></au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1"><p>Department of Mathematics, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China</p></ins>
            <ins id="I2"><p>Department of Mathematics, Shijiazhuang Mechanical Engineering College, Shijiazhuang 050003, China</p></ins>
            <ins id="I3"><p>Department of Mathematics, Gyeongsang National University, Jinju 660-701, Republic of Korea</p></ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Fixed Point Theory and Applications</source>
         <issn>1687-1812</issn>
         <pubdate>2010</pubdate>
         <volume>2010</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>547828</fpage>
         <url>http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2010/1/547828</url>
         <xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1155/2010/547828</pubid></xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history><rec><date><day>16</day><month>7</month><year>2010</year></date></rec><revrec><date><day>30</day><month>11</month><year>2010</year></date></revrec><acc><date><day>20</day><month>12</month><year>2010</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>5</day><month>1</month><year>2011</year></date></pub></history>
      <cpyrt><year>2010</year><collab>Yuan Qing et al.</collab><note>This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p/>
            </st>
            <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i1.gif"/></inline-formula> be a Hilbert space and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i2.gif"/></inline-formula> a nonempty closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i3.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i4.gif"/></inline-formula> be a maximal monotone mapping and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i5.gif"/></inline-formula> a bounded demicontinuous strong pseudocontraction. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i6.gif"/></inline-formula> be the unique solution to the equation <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i7.gif"/></inline-formula>. Then<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i8.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded if and only if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i9.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to a zero point of <it>A</it> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i10.gif"/></inline-formula> which is the unique solution in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i11.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i12.gif"/></inline-formula> denotes the zero set of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i13.gif"/></inline-formula>, to the following variational inequality <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i14.gif"/></inline-formula>, for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i15.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>1. Introduction and Preliminaries</p>
         </st>
         <p>Throughout this work, we always assume that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i16.gif"/></inline-formula> is a real Hilbert space, whose inner product and norm are denoted by <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i17.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i18.gif"/></inline-formula>, respectively. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i19.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i20.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i21.gif"/></inline-formula> a nonlinear mapping. We use <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i22.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i23.gif"/></inline-formula> to denote the domain and the range of the mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i24.gif"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i25.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i26.gif"/></inline-formula> denote strong and weak convergence, respectively.</p>
         <p>Recall the following well-known definitions. </p>
         <p indent="1">(1)A mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i27.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be <it>monotone</it> if </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M11">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i28.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p indent="1">(2)The single-valued mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i29.gif"/></inline-formula> is <it>maximal</it> if the graph <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i30.gif"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i31.gif"/></inline-formula> is not properly contained in the graph of any other monotone mapping. It is known that a monotone mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i32.gif"/></inline-formula> is <it>maximal</it> if and only if for <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i33.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i34.gif"/></inline-formula> for every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i35.gif"/></inline-formula> implies <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i36.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p indent="1">(3)<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i37.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be <it>pseudomonotone</it> if for any sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i38.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i39.gif"/></inline-formula> which converges weakly to an element <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i40.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i41.gif"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i42.gif"/></inline-formula> we have </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M12">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i43.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p indent="1">(4)<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i44.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be <it>bounded</it> if it carries bounded sets into bounded sets; it is coercive if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i45.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i46.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p indent="1">(5)Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i47.gif"/></inline-formula> be linear normed spaces. <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i48.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be <it>demicontinuous</it> if, for any <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i49.gif"/></inline-formula> we have <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i50.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i51.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p indent="1">(6)Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i52.gif"/></inline-formula> be a mapping of a linear normed space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i53.gif"/></inline-formula> into its dual space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i54.gif"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i55.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be <it>hemicontinuous</it> if it is continuous from each line segment in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i56.gif"/></inline-formula> to the weak topology in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i57.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p indent="1">(7)The mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i58.gif"/></inline-formula> with the domain <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i59.gif"/></inline-formula> and the range <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i60.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i61.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be <it>pseudocontractive</it> if </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M13">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i62.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p indent="1">(8)The mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i63.gif"/></inline-formula> with the domain <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i64.gif"/></inline-formula> and the range <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i65.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i66.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be <it>strongly pseudocontractive</it> if there exists a constant <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i67.gif"/></inline-formula> such that </p>
         <p/>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M14">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i68.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Remark 1.1. </p>
         <p>For the maximal monotone operator <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i69.gif"/></inline-formula>, we can defined the resolvent of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i70.gif"/></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i71.gif"/></inline-formula>. It is well know that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i72.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonexpansive.</p>
         <p>Remark 1.2. </p>
         <p>It is well-known that if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i73.gif"/></inline-formula> is demicontinuous, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i74.gif"/></inline-formula> is hemicontinuous, however, the converse, in general, may not be true. In reflexive Banach spaces, for monotone mappings defined on the whole Banach space, demicontinuity is equivalent to hemicontinuity.</p>
         <p>To find zeroes of maximal monotone operators is the central and important topics in nonlinear functional analysis. We observe that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i75.gif"/></inline-formula> is a zero of the monotone mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i76.gif"/></inline-formula> if and only if it is a fixed point of the pseudocontractive mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i77.gif"/></inline-formula>. Consequently, considerable research works, especially, for the past 40 years or more, have been devoted to the existence and convergence of zero points for monotone mappings or fixed points of pseudocontractions, see, for instance, [<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>&#8211;<abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>].</p>
         <p>In 1965, Browder [<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>] proved the existence result of fixed point for demicontinuous pseudocontractions in Hilbert spaces. To be more precise, he proved the following theorem.</p>
         <p>Theorem Bo</p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i78.gif"/></inline-formula> be a Hilbert space, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i79.gif"/></inline-formula> a nonempty bounded and closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i80.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i81.gif"/></inline-formula> a demicontinuous pseduo-contraction. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i82.gif"/></inline-formula> has a fixed point in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i83.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>In 1968, Browder [<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>] proved the existence results of zero points for maximal monotone mappings in reflexive Banach spaces. To be more precise, he proved the following theorem.</p>
         <p>Theorem Bt</p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i84.gif"/></inline-formula> be a reflexive Banach space, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i85.gif"/></inline-formula> a maximal monotone mapping and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i86.gif"/></inline-formula> a bounded, pseudomonotone and coercive mapping. Then, for any <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i87.gif"/></inline-formula>, there exists <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i88.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i89.gif"/></inline-formula>, or <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i90.gif"/></inline-formula> is all of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i91.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>For the existence of continuous paths for continuous pseudocontractions in Banach spaces, Morales and Jung [<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>] proved the following theorem.</p>
         <p>Theorem MJ. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i92.gif"/></inline-formula> be a Banach space. Suppose that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i93.gif"/></inline-formula> is a nonempty closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i94.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i95.gif"/></inline-formula> is a continuous pseudocontraction satisfying the weakly inward condition. Then for each <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i96.gif"/></inline-formula>, there exists a unique continuous path <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i97.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i98.gif"/></inline-formula>, which satisfies the following equation <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i99.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>In 2002, Lan and Wu [<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>] partially improved the result of Morales and Jung [<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>] from continuous pseudocontractions to demicontinuous pseudocontractions in the framework of Hilbert spaces. To be more precise, they proved the following theorem.</p>
         <p>Theorem LW. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i100.gif"/></inline-formula> be a bounded closed convex set in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i101.gif"/></inline-formula>. Assume that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i102.gif"/></inline-formula> is a demicontinuous weakly inward pseudocontractive map. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i103.gif"/></inline-formula> has a fixed point in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i104.gif"/></inline-formula>. Moreover; for every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i105.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i106.gif"/></inline-formula> defined by <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i107.gif"/></inline-formula> converges to a fixed point of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i108.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>In this work, motivated by Browder [<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>], Lan and Wu [<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>], Morales and Jung [<abbr bid="B15">15</abbr>], Song and Chen [<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>], and Zhou [<abbr bid="B22">22</abbr>, <abbr bid="B23">23</abbr>], we consider the existence of convergence of paths for maximal monotone mappings in the framework of real Hilbert spaces.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>2. Main Results</p>
         </st>
         <p>Lemma 2.1. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i109.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i110.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i111.gif"/></inline-formula> a demicontinuous monotone mapping. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i112.gif"/></inline-formula> is pseudomonotone.</p>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>For any sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i113.gif"/></inline-formula> which converges weakly to an element <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i114.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i115.gif"/></inline-formula> such that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M21">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i116.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>we see from the monotonicity of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i117.gif"/></inline-formula> that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M22">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i118.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Combining (2.1) with (2.2), we obtain that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M23">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i119.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>By taking <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i120.gif"/></inline-formula>, we arrive at </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M24">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i121.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>which yields that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M25">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i122.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Noticing that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M26">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i123.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>we have </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M27">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i124.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i125.gif"/></inline-formula>, for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i126.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i127.gif"/></inline-formula>. By taking <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i128.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i129.gif"/></inline-formula> in (2.7), we see that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M28">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i130.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Noting that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i131.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i132.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i133.gif"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i134.gif"/></inline-formula> is demicontinuous, we have <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i135.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i136.gif"/></inline-formula>, and hence </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M29">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i137.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>This completes the proof.</p>
         <p>Lemma 2.2. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i138.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i139.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i140.gif"/></inline-formula> a maximal monotone mapping, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i141.gif"/></inline-formula> a bounded, demicontinuous, and strongly monotone mapping. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i142.gif"/></inline-formula> has a unique zero in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i143.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>By using Lemma 2.1 and Theorem B2, we can obtain the desired conclusion easily.</p>
         <p>Lemma 2.3. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i144.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i145.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i146.gif"/></inline-formula> a maximal monotone mapping, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i147.gif"/></inline-formula> a bounded, demicontinuous strong pseudocontraction with the coefficient <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i148.gif"/></inline-formula>. For <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i149.gif"/></inline-formula>, consider the equation </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M210">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i150.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i151.gif"/></inline-formula>. Then, One has the following.</p>
         <p indent="1">(i)Equation (2.10) has a unique solution <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i152.gif"/></inline-formula> for every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i153.gif"/></inline-formula>. </p>
         <p indent="1">(ii)If <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i154.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i155.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i156.gif"/></inline-formula>. </p>
         <p indent="1">(iii)If <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i157.gif"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i158.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded and satisfies </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M211">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i159.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i160.gif"/></inline-formula> denotes the zero set of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i161.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p/>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>(i) From Lemma 2.2, one can obtain the desired conclusion easily.</p>
         <p>(ii) We use <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i162.gif"/></inline-formula> to denote the unique solution of (2.10). That is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i163.gif"/></inline-formula>. It follows that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i164.gif"/></inline-formula>. Notice that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M212">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i165.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>From the boundedness of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i166.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i167.gif"/></inline-formula>, one has <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i168.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>(iii) For <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i169.gif"/></inline-formula>, one obtains that</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M213">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i170.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>It follows that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M214">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i171.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>That is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i172.gif"/></inline-formula>, for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i173.gif"/></inline-formula>. This shows that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i174.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded. Noticing that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i175.gif"/></inline-formula>, one arrives at </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M215">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i176.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>This completes the proof.</p>
         <p>Lemma 2.4. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i177.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i178.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i179.gif"/></inline-formula> a maximal monotone mapping. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i180.gif"/></inline-formula>. If one defines <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i181.gif"/></inline-formula> by <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i182.gif"/></inline-formula>, for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i183.gif"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i184.gif"/></inline-formula> is a nonexpansive mapping with <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i185.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i186.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i187.gif"/></inline-formula> denotes the set of fixed points of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i188.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>Noticing that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i189.gif"/></inline-formula> is maximal monotone, one has <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i190.gif"/></inline-formula>. It follows that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i191.gif"/></inline-formula>. For any <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i192.gif"/></inline-formula>, one sees that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M216">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i193.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>which yields that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i194.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonexpansive mapping. Notice that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M217">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i195.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>That is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i196.gif"/></inline-formula>. On the other hand, for any <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i197.gif"/></inline-formula>, we have </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M218">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i198.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>This completes the proof.</p>
         <p>Set <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i199.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i200.gif"/></inline-formula> denote the Banach space of all bounded real value functions on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i201.gif"/></inline-formula> with the supremum norm, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i202.gif"/></inline-formula> a subspace of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i203.gif"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i204.gif"/></inline-formula> an element in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i205.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i206.gif"/></inline-formula> denotes the dual space of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i207.gif"/></inline-formula>. Denote by <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i208.gif"/></inline-formula> the value of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i209.gif"/></inline-formula> at <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i210.gif"/></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i211.gif"/></inline-formula>, for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i212.gif"/></inline-formula>, sometimes <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i213.gif"/></inline-formula> will be denoted by <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i214.gif"/></inline-formula>. When <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i215.gif"/></inline-formula> contains constants, a linear functional <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i216.gif"/></inline-formula> on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i217.gif"/></inline-formula> is called a mean on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i218.gif"/></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i219.gif"/></inline-formula>. We also know that if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i220.gif"/></inline-formula> contains constants, then the following are equivalent. </p>
         <p indent="1">(1)<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i221.gif"/></inline-formula>. </p>
         <p indent="1">(2)<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i222.gif"/></inline-formula>, for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i223.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p/>
         <p>To prove our main results, we also need the following lemma.</p>
         <p>Lemma 2.5 (see [<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>, Lemma 4.5.4]). </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i224.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty and closed convex subset of a Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i225.gif"/></inline-formula>. Suppose that norm of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i226.gif"/></inline-formula> is uniformly G&#226;teaux differentiable. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i227.gif"/></inline-formula> be a bounded set in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i228.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i229.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i230.gif"/></inline-formula> be a mean on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i231.gif"/></inline-formula>. Then </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M219">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i232.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>if and only if </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M220">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i233.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Now, we are in a position to prove the main results of this work.</p>
         <p>Theorem 2.6. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i234.gif"/></inline-formula> be a Hilbert space and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i235.gif"/></inline-formula> a nonempty closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i236.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i237.gif"/></inline-formula> be a maximal monotone mapping and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i238.gif"/></inline-formula> a bounded demicontinuous strong pseudocontraction. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i239.gif"/></inline-formula> be as in Lemma 2.3. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i240.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded if and only if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i241.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to a zero point <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i242.gif"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i243.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i244.gif"/></inline-formula> which is the unique solution in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i245.gif"/></inline-formula> to the following variational inequality: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M221">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i246.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>The part <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i247.gif"/></inline-formula> is obvious and we only prove <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i248.gif"/></inline-formula>. From Lemma 2.3, one sees that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i249.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i250.gif"/></inline-formula>. It follows from Lemma 2.4 that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i251.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i252.gif"/></inline-formula>. Define <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i253.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i254.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i255.gif"/></inline-formula> is a Banach limit. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i256.gif"/></inline-formula> is a convex and continuous function with <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i257.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i258.gif"/></inline-formula>. Put </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M222">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i259.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>From the convexity and continuity of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i260.gif"/></inline-formula>, we can get the convexity and continuity of the set <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i261.gif"/></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i262.gif"/></inline-formula> is continuous and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i263.gif"/></inline-formula> is a Hilbert space, we see that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i264.gif"/></inline-formula> attains its infimum over <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i265.gif"/></inline-formula>; see [<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>] for more details. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i266.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonempty bounded and closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i267.gif"/></inline-formula>. Indeed, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i268.gif"/></inline-formula> contains one point only. Set <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i269.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i270.gif"/></inline-formula>. Notice that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i271.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonexpansive. Since every nonempty bounded and closed convex subset has the fixed point property for nonexpansive self-mapping in the framework of Hilbert spaces, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i272.gif"/></inline-formula> has a fixed point <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i273.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i274.gif"/></inline-formula>, that is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i275.gif"/></inline-formula>. It follows from Lemma 2.4 that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i276.gif"/></inline-formula>. On the other hand, one has <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i277.gif"/></inline-formula>. In view of Lemma 2.5, we obtain that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M223">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i278.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>By taking <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i279.gif"/></inline-formula> in (2.23), we arrive at </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M224">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i280.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Combining (2.14) with (2.23) yields that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i281.gif"/></inline-formula>. Hence, there exists a subnet <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i282.gif"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i283.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i284.gif"/></inline-formula>. From (iii) of Lemma 2.3, one has </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M225">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i285.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Taking limit in (2.25), one gets that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M226">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i286.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>If there exists another subset <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i287.gif"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i288.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i289.gif"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i290.gif"/></inline-formula> is also a zero of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i291.gif"/></inline-formula>. It follows from (2.26) that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M227">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i292.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>By using (iii) of Lemma 2.3 again, one arrives at </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M228">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i293.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Taking limit in (2.28), we obtain that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M229">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i294.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Adding (2.27) and (2.29), we have </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M230">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i295.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>which yields that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M231">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i296.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>It follows that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i297.gif"/></inline-formula>. That is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i298.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i299.gif"/></inline-formula>, which is the unique solution to the following variational inequality: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M232">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i300.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>Remark 2.7. </p>
         <p>From Theorem 2.6, we can obtain the following interesting fixed point theorem. The composition of bounded, demicontinuous, and strong pseudocontractions with the metric projection has a unique fixed point. That is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i301.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgment</p>
            </st>
            <p>The third author was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant no. 10771050).</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>Fixed-point theorems for noncompact mappings in Hilbert space</p></title><aug><au><snm>Browder</snm><fnm>FE</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</source><pubdate>1965</pubdate><volume>53</volume><fpage>1272</fpage><lpage>1276</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.53.6.1272</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">219828</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16578602</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Convergence of approximants to fixed points of nonexpansive non-linear mappings in Banach spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Browder</snm><fnm>FE</fnm></au></aug><source>Archive for Rational Mechanics and Analysis</source><pubdate>1967</pubdate><volume>24</volume><fpage>82</fpage><lpage>90</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>Nonlinear operators and nonlinear equations of evolution in Banach spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Browder</snm><fnm>FE</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Functional Analysis (Proc. Sympos. Pure Math., Vol. XVIII, Part 2, Chicago, Ill., 1968)</source><publisher>American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, USA</publisher><pubdate>1976</pubdate><fpage>1</fpage><lpage>308</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B4"><title><p>Nonlinear maximal monotone operators in Banach space</p></title><aug><au><snm>Browder</snm><fnm>FE</fnm></au></aug><source>Mathematische Annalen</source><pubdate>1968</pubdate><volume>175</volume><fpage>89</fpage><lpage>113</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF01418765</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>Nonlinear monotone and accretive operators in Banach spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Browder</snm><fnm>FE</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America</source><pubdate>1968</pubdate><volume>61</volume><fpage>388</fpage><lpage>393</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1073/pnas.61.2.388</pubid><pubid idtype="pmcid">225169</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">16591695</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>A strongly convergent iterative solution of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i302.gif"/></inline-formula> for a maximal monotone operator <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-547828-i303.gif"/></inline-formula> in Hilbert space</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bruck,</snm><fnm>RE</fnm><suf>Jr.</suf></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>1974</pubdate><volume>48</volume><fpage>114</fpage><lpage>126</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0022-247X(74)90219-4</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>An approximation method for strictly pseudocontractive mappings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au><au><snm>Lin</snm><fnm>P-K</fnm></au><au><snm>Song</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>64</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>2527</fpage><lpage>2535</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.na.2005.08.031</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21967941</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>Fixed point iteration for pseudocontractive maps</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chidume</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au><au><snm>Moore</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>127</volume><issue>4</issue><fpage>1163</fpage><lpage>1170</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1090/S0002-9939-99-05050-9</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Nonlinear accretive and pseudo-contractive operator equations in Banach spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chidume</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au><au><snm>Osilike</snm><fnm>MO</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications</source><pubdate>1998</pubdate><volume>31</volume><issue>7</issue><fpage>779</fpage><lpage>789</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0362-546X(97)00439-2</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21967941</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Approximate fixed point sequences and convergence theorems for Lipschitz pseudocontractive maps</p></title><aug><au><snm>Chidume</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au><au><snm>Zegeye</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society</source><pubdate>2004</pubdate><volume>132</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>831</fpage><lpage>840</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1090/S0002-9939-03-07101-6</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B11"><aug><au><snm>Deimling</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Functional Analysis</source><publisher>Springer, Berlin, Germany</publisher><pubdate>1985</pubdate><fpage>xiv+450</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Zeros of accretive operators</p></title><aug><au><snm>Deimling</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au></aug><source>Manuscripta Mathematica</source><pubdate>1974</pubdate><volume>13</volume><fpage>365</fpage><lpage>374</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/BF01171148</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>Demicontinuity, hemicontinuity and monotonicity</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kato</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au></aug><source>Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society</source><pubdate>1964</pubdate><volume>70</volume><fpage>548</fpage><lpage>550</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1090/S0002-9904-1964-11194-0</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Convergence of approximants for demicontinuous pseudo-contractive maps in Hilbert spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Lan</snm><fnm>KQ</fnm></au><au><snm>Wu</snm><fnm>JH</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>49</volume><issue>6</issue><fpage>737</fpage><lpage>746</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0362-546X(01)00130-4</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21967941</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>Convergence of paths for pseudocontractive mappings in Banach spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Morales</snm><fnm>CH</fnm></au><au><snm>Jung</snm><fnm>JS</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society</source><pubdate>2000</pubdate><volume>128</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>3411</fpage><lpage>3419</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1090/S0002-9939-00-05573-8</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Convergence of the steepest descent method for accretive operators</p></title><aug><au><snm>Morales</snm><fnm>CH</fnm></au><au><snm>Chidume</snm><fnm>CE</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society</source><pubdate>1999</pubdate><volume>127</volume><issue>12</issue><fpage>3677</fpage><lpage>3683</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1090/S0002-9939-99-04975-8</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><title><p>Approximation of a zero point of accretive operator in Banach spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Qin</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Su</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>329</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>415</fpage><lpage>424</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.jmaa.2006.06.067</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B18"><title><p>Approximating zeros of monotone operators by proximal point algorithms</p></title><aug><au><snm>Qin</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au><au><snm>Kang</snm><fnm>SM</fnm></au><au><snm>Cho</snm><fnm>YJ</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Global Optimization</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>46</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>75</fpage><lpage>87</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s10898-009-9410-6</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Convergence theorems of iterative algorithms for continuous pseudocontractive mappings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Song</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Chen</snm><fnm>R</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>67</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>486</fpage><lpage>497</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.na.2006.06.009</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21967941</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><aug><au><snm>Takahashi</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Functional Analysis, Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications</source><publisher>Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama, Japan</publisher><pubdate>2000</pubdate><fpage>iv+276</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Iterative solutions of nonlinear equations involving strongly accretive operators without the Lipschitz assumption</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhou</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>1997</pubdate><volume>213</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>296</fpage><lpage>307</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1006/jmaa.1997.5539</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B22"><title><p>Convergence theorems of common fixed points for a finite family of Lipschitz pseudocontractions in Banach spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhou</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>68</volume><issue>10</issue><fpage>2977</fpage><lpage>2983</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.na.2007.02.041</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21967941</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B23"><title><p>Convergence theorems of fixed points for Lipschitz pseudo-contractions in Hilbert spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhou</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>343</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>546</fpage><lpage>556</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.jmaa.2008.01.045</pubid></xrefbib></bibl></refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>