<?xml version='1.0'?>
<!DOCTYPE art SYSTEM 'http://www.biomedcentral.com/xml/article.dtd'>
<art>
   <ui>1687-1812-2010-170701</ui>
   <ji>1687-1812</ji>
   <fm>
      <dochead>Research Article</dochead>
      <bibl>
         <title>
            <p>Modified Hybrid Algorithm for a Family of Quasi-<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i1.gif"/></inline-formula>-Asymptotically Nonexpansive Mappings</p>
         </title>
         <aug>
            <au id="A1"><snm>Xu</snm><fnm>Yongchun</fnm><insr iid="I1"/><email>xyc2221176@126.com</email></au>
            <au id="A2"><snm>Zhang</snm><fnm>Xin</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>zhangxinmath@yahoo.com.cn</email></au>
            <au id="A3"><snm>Kang</snm><fnm>Jinlong</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>kangjinlong1997@yahoo.cn</email></au>
            <au id="A4" ca="yes"><snm>Su</snm><fnm>Yongfu</fnm><insr iid="I2"/><email>suyongfu@tjpu.edu.cn</email></au>
         </aug>
         <insg>
            <ins id="I1"><p>Department of Mathematics, Hebei North University, Zhangjiakou 075000, China</p></ins>
            <ins id="I2"><p>Department of Mathematics, Tianjin Polytechnic University, Tianjin 300160, China</p></ins>
         </insg>
         <source>Fixed Point Theory and Applications</source>
         <issn>1687-1812</issn>
         <pubdate>2010</pubdate>
         <volume>2010</volume>
         <issue>1</issue>
         <fpage>170701</fpage>
         <url>http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2010/1/170701</url>
         <xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1155/2010/170701</pubid></xrefbib>
      </bibl>
      <history><rec><date><day>19</day><month>3</month><year>2010</year></date></rec><acc><date><day>16</day><month>8</month><year>2010</year></date></acc><pub><date><day>19</day><month>8</month><year>2010</year></date></pub></history>
      <cpyrt><year>2010</year><collab>Yongchun Xu et al.</collab><note>This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.</note></cpyrt>
      <abs>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p/>
            </st>
            <p>The purpose of this paper is to propose a modified hybrid projection algorithm and prove strong convergence theorems for a family of quasi-<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i2.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings. The method of the proof is different from the original one. Our results improve and extend the corresponding results announced by Zhou et al. (2010), Kimura and Takahashi (2009), and some others.</p>
         </sec>
      </abs>
   </fm>
   <bdy>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>1. Introduction</p>
         </st>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i3.gif"/></inline-formula> be a real Banach space and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i4.gif"/></inline-formula> a nonempty closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i5.gif"/></inline-formula>. A mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i6.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be asymptotically nonexpansive [<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>] if there exists a sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i7.gif"/></inline-formula> of positive real numbers with <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i8.gif"/></inline-formula> such that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M11">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i9.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i10.gif"/></inline-formula> and all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i11.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>The class of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings was introduced by Goebel and Kirk [<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>] in 1972. They proved that if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i12.gif"/></inline-formula> is a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a uniformly convex Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i13.gif"/></inline-formula>, then every asymptotically nonexpansive self-mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i14.gif"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i15.gif"/></inline-formula> has a fixed point. Further, the set <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i16.gif"/></inline-formula> of fixed points of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i17.gif"/></inline-formula> is closed and convex. Since 1972, a host of authors have studied the weak and strong convergence problems of the iterative algorithms for such a class of mappings (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B1">1</abbr>&#8211;<abbr bid="B3">3</abbr>] and the references therein). </p>
         <p>It is well known that in an infinite-dimensional Hilbert space, the normal <it>Mann's</it> iterative algorithm has only weak convergence, in general, even for nonexpansive mappings. Consequently, in order to obtain strong convergence, one has to modify the normal <it>Mann's</it> iteration algorithm; the so-called hybrid projection iteration method is such a modification.</p>
         <p>The hybrid projection iteration algorithm (HPIA) was introduced initially by Haugazeau [<abbr bid="B4">4</abbr>] in 1968. For 40 years, (HPIA) has received rapid developments. For details, the readers are referred to papers in [<abbr bid="B5">5</abbr>&#8211;<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>] and the references therein.</p>
         <p>In 2003, Nakajo and Takahashi [<abbr bid="B6">6</abbr>] proposed the following modification of the Mann iteration method for a nonexpansive mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i18.gif"/></inline-formula> in a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i19.gif"/></inline-formula>: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M12">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i20.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i21.gif"/></inline-formula> is a closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i22.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i23.gif"/></inline-formula> denotes the metric projection from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i24.gif"/></inline-formula> onto a closed convex subset <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i25.gif"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i26.gif"/></inline-formula>. They proved that if the sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i27.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded above from one then the sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i28.gif"/></inline-formula> generated by (1.2) converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i29.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i30.gif"/></inline-formula> denote the fixed points set of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i31.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>In 2006, Kim and Xu [<abbr bid="B12">12</abbr>] proposed the following modification of the Mann iteration method for asymptotically nonexpansive mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i32.gif"/></inline-formula> in a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i33.gif"/></inline-formula>: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M13">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i34.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i35.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded closed convex subset and </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M14">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i36.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>They proved that if the sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i37.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded above from one, then the sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i38.gif"/></inline-formula> generated by (1.3) converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i39.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>They also proposed the following modification of the Mann iteration method for asymptotically nonexpansive semigroup <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i40.gif"/></inline-formula> in a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i41.gif"/></inline-formula>:</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M15">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i42.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i43.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded closed convex subset and </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M16">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i44.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i45.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonincreasing in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i46.gif"/></inline-formula> and bounded measurable function such that, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i47.gif"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i48.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i49.gif"/></inline-formula>, and for each <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i50.gif"/></inline-formula>, </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M17">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i51.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>They proved that if the sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i52.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded above from one, then the sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i53.gif"/></inline-formula> generated by (1.5) converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i54.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i55.gif"/></inline-formula> denote the common fixed points set of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i56.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>In 2006, Martinez-Yanes and Xu [<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>] proposed the following modification of the Ishikawa iteration method for nonexpansive mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i57.gif"/></inline-formula> in a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i58.gif"/></inline-formula>: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M18">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i59.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i60.gif"/></inline-formula> is a closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i61.gif"/></inline-formula>. They proved that if the sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i62.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded above from one and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i63.gif"/></inline-formula>, then the sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i64.gif"/></inline-formula> generated by (1.8) converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i65.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Martinez-Yanes and Xu [<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>] proposed also the following modification of the Halpern iteration method for nonexpansive mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i66.gif"/></inline-formula> in a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i67.gif"/></inline-formula>: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M19">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i68.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i69.gif"/></inline-formula> is a closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i70.gif"/></inline-formula>. They proved that if the sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i71.gif"/></inline-formula>, then the sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i72.gif"/></inline-formula> generated by (1.9) converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i73.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>In 2005, Matsushita and Takahashi [<abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>] proposed the following hybrid iteration method with generalized projection for relatively nonexpansive mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i74.gif"/></inline-formula> in a Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i75.gif"/></inline-formula>: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M110">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i76.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>They proved the following convergence theorem.</p>
         <p>Theorem MT.. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i77.gif"/></inline-formula> be a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space, let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i78.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i79.gif"/></inline-formula>, let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i80.gif"/></inline-formula> be a relatively nonexpansive mapping from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i81.gif"/></inline-formula> into itself, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i82.gif"/></inline-formula> be a sequence of real numbers such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i83.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i84.gif"/></inline-formula>. Suppose that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i85.gif"/></inline-formula> is given by (1.10), where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i86.gif"/></inline-formula> is the duality mapping on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i87.gif"/></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i88.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonempty, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i89.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i90.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i91.gif"/></inline-formula> is the generalized projection from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i92.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i93.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>In 2009, Zhou et al. [<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>] proposed the following modification of the hybrid iteration method with generalized projection for a family of closed and quasi-<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i94.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i95.gif"/></inline-formula> in a Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i96.gif"/></inline-formula>: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M1">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i97.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>They proved the following convergence theorem. </p>
         <p>Theorem ZGT.</p>
         <p>
            <it>Let</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i98.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>be a nonempty bounded closed convex subset of a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i99.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>, and let</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i100.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>be a family of</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i101.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings such that</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i102.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>. Assume that every</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i103.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>,</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i104.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>is asymptotically regular on</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i105.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>. Let</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i106.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>be a real sequence in</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i107.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>such that</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i108.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>. Define a sequence</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i109.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>as given by ( 1 ), then</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i110.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>converges strongly to</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i111.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>, where</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i112.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>,</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i113.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>for all</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i114.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>,</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i115.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>, and</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i116.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>is the generalized projection from</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i117.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>onto</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i118.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>.</it>
         </p>
         <p>Very recently, Kimura and Takahashi [<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>] established strong convergence theorems by the hybrid method for a family of relatively nonexpansive mappings as follows. </p>
         <p>Theorem KT.</p>
         <p>
            <it>Let</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i119.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>be a strictly convex reflexive Banach space having the Kadec-Klee property and a Fr&#233;chet differentiable norm, and let</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i120.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>be a nonempty and closed convex subset of</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i121.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>and</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i122.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>a family of relatively nonexpensive mappings of</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i123.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>into itself having a common fixed point. Let</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i124.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>be a sequence in</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i125.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>such that</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i126.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>. For an arbitrarily chosen point</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i127.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>, generate a sequence</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i128.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>by the following iterative scheme:</it>
            <inline-formula>
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i129.gif"/>
            </inline-formula>
            <it>, and</it>
         </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M112">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i130.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i131.gif"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i132.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i133.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i134.gif"/></inline-formula> is the set of common fixed points of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i135.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i136.gif"/></inline-formula> is the metric projection of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i137.gif"/></inline-formula> onto a nonempty closed convex subset <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i138.gif"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i139.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Motivated by these results above, the purpose of this paper is to propose a Modified hybrid projection algorithm and prove strong convergence theorems for a family of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i140.gif"/></inline-formula>-<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i141.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings which are asymptotically regular on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i142.gif"/></inline-formula>. In order to get the strong convergence theorems for such a family of mappings, the classical hybrid projection iteration algorithm is modified and then is used to approximate the common fixed points of such a family of mappings. In the meantime, the method of the proof is different from the original one. Our results improve and extend the corresponding results announced by Zhou et al. [<abbr bid="B11">11</abbr>], and Kimura and Takahashi [<abbr bid="B13">13</abbr>], and some others. </p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>2. Preliminaries</p>
         </st>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i143.gif"/></inline-formula> be a Banach space with dual <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i144.gif"/></inline-formula>. Denote by <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i145.gif"/></inline-formula> the duality product. The normalize duality mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i146.gif"/></inline-formula> from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i147.gif"/></inline-formula> to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i148.gif"/></inline-formula> is defined by </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M21">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i149.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i150.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i151.gif"/></inline-formula> denotes the dual space of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i152.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i153.gif"/></inline-formula> the generalized duality pairing between <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i154.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i155.gif"/></inline-formula>. It is well known that if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i156.gif"/></inline-formula> is uniformly convex, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i157.gif"/></inline-formula> is uniformly continuous on bounded subsets of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i158.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>It is also very well known that if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i159.gif"/></inline-formula> is a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i160.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i161.gif"/></inline-formula> is the metric projection of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i162.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i163.gif"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i164.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonexpansive. This fact actually characterizes Hilbert spaces <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i165.gif"/></inline-formula>, and consequently, it is not available in more general Banach spaces. In this connection, Alber [<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>] recently introduced a generalized projection operator <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i166.gif"/></inline-formula> in a Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i167.gif"/></inline-formula> which is an analogue of the metric projection in Hilbert spaces. </p>
         <p>Next, we assume that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i168.gif"/></inline-formula> is a real smooth Banach space. Let us consider the functional defined by [<abbr bid="B7">7</abbr>, <abbr bid="B8">8</abbr>] as</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M22">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i169.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i170.gif"/></inline-formula>. Observe that, in a Hilbert space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i171.gif"/></inline-formula>, (2.2) reduces to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i172.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i173.gif"/></inline-formula>,<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i174.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>The generalized projection <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i175.gif"/></inline-formula> is a map that assigns to an arbitrary point <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i176.gif"/></inline-formula>, the minimum point of the functional <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i177.gif"/></inline-formula>, that is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i178.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i179.gif"/></inline-formula> is the solution to the minimization problem </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M23">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i180.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Existence and uniqueness of the operator <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i181.gif"/></inline-formula> follow from the properties of the C functional <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i182.gif"/></inline-formula> and strict monotonicity of the mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i183.gif"/></inline-formula> (see, e.g., [<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>&#8211;<abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>]). In Hilbert spaces, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i184.gif"/></inline-formula>. It is obvious from the definition of function <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i185.gif"/></inline-formula> that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M24">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i186.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i187.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Remark 2.1. </p>
         <p>If <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i188.gif"/></inline-formula> is a reflexive strictly convex and smooth Banach space, then for <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i189.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i190.gif"/></inline-formula> if and only if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i191.gif"/></inline-formula>. It is sufficient to show that if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i192.gif"/></inline-formula>, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i193.gif"/></inline-formula>. From (2.4), we have <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i194.gif"/></inline-formula>. This implies that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i195.gif"/></inline-formula> From the definitions of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i196.gif"/></inline-formula>, we have <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i197.gif"/></inline-formula>. That is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i198.gif"/></inline-formula> see [<abbr bid="B17">17</abbr>, <abbr bid="B18">18</abbr>] for more details.</p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i199.gif"/></inline-formula> be a closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i200.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i201.gif"/></inline-formula> a mapping from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i202.gif"/></inline-formula> into itself. <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i203.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i204.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive if there exists some real sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i205.gif"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i206.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i207.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i208.gif"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i209.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i210.gif"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i211.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i212.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive [<abbr bid="B9">9</abbr>] if there exists some real sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i213.gif"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i214.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i215.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i216.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i217.gif"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i218.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i219.gif"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i220.gif"/></inline-formula>. <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i221.gif"/></inline-formula> is said to be asymptotically regular on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i222.gif"/></inline-formula> if, for any bounded subset <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i223.gif"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i224.gif"/></inline-formula>, there holds the following equality: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M25">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i225.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p/>
         <p>We remark that a <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i226.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping with a nonempty fixed point set <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i227.gif"/></inline-formula> is a quasi-<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i228.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping, but the converse may be not true.</p>
         <p>We present some examples which are closed and quasi-<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i229.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive. </p>
         <p>Example 2.2. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i230.gif"/></inline-formula> be a real line. We define a mapping <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i231.gif"/></inline-formula> by</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M26">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i232.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i233.gif"/></inline-formula> is continuous quasi-nonexpansive, and hence it is closed and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i234.gif"/></inline-formula> nonexpansive with the constant sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i235.gif"/></inline-formula> but not asymptotically nonexpansive.</p>
         <p>Example 2.3. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i236.gif"/></inline-formula> be a uniformly smooth and strictly convex Banach space, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i237.gif"/></inline-formula> is a maximal monotone mapping such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i238.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonempty. Then, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i239.gif"/></inline-formula> is a closed and quasi-<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i240.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i241.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i242.gif"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i243.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Example 2.4. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i244.gif"/></inline-formula> be the generalized projection from a smooth, strictly convex, and reflexive Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i245.gif"/></inline-formula> onto a nonempty closed convex subset <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i246.gif"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i247.gif"/></inline-formula>. Then, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i248.gif"/></inline-formula> is a closed and quasi-<inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i249.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mapping from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i250.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i251.gif"/></inline-formula> with <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i252.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i253.gif"/></inline-formula> be a sequence of nonempty closed convex subsets of a reflexive Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i254.gif"/></inline-formula>. We denote two subsets <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i255.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i256.gif"/></inline-formula> as follows: <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i257.gif"/></inline-formula> if and only if there exists <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i258.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i259.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i260.gif"/></inline-formula> and that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i261.gif"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i262.gif"/></inline-formula>. Similarly, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i263.gif"/></inline-formula> if and only if there exists a subsequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i264.gif"/></inline-formula> of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i265.gif"/></inline-formula> and a sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i266.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i267.gif"/></inline-formula> converges weakly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i268.gif"/></inline-formula> and that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i269.gif"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i270.gif"/></inline-formula>. We define the Mosco convergence [<abbr bid="B19">19</abbr>] of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i271.gif"/></inline-formula> as follows. If <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i272.gif"/></inline-formula> satisfies that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i273.gif"/></inline-formula>, it is said that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i274.gif"/></inline-formula> converges to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i275.gif"/></inline-formula> in the sense of Mosco, and we write <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i276.gif"/></inline-formula>. For more details, see [<abbr bid="B20">20</abbr>].</p>
         <p>The following theorem plays an important role in our results. </p>
         <p>Theorem 2.5 (see Ibaraki et al. [<abbr bid="B21">21</abbr>]). </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i277.gif"/></inline-formula> be a smooth, reflexive, and strictly convex Banach space having the Kadec-Klee property. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i278.gif"/></inline-formula> be a sequence of nonempty closed convex subsets of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i279.gif"/></inline-formula>. If <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i280.gif"/></inline-formula> exists and is nonempty, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i281.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i282.gif"/></inline-formula> for each <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i283.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>We also need the following lemmas for the proof of our main results. </p>
         <p>Lemma 2.6 (Kamimura and Takahashi [<abbr bid="B16">16</abbr>]). </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i284.gif"/></inline-formula> be a uniformly convex and smooth Banach space, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i285.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i286.gif"/></inline-formula> be two sequences of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i287.gif"/></inline-formula> if <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i288.gif"/></inline-formula> and either <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i289.gif"/></inline-formula> or <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i290.gif"/></inline-formula> is bounded, then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i291.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Lemma 2.7 (Alber [<abbr bid="B14">14</abbr>]). </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i292.gif"/></inline-formula> be a reflexive, strictly convex and smooth Banach space, let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i293.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i294.gif"/></inline-formula>, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i295.gif"/></inline-formula>. Then</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M27">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i296.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i297.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Lemma 2.8. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i298.gif"/></inline-formula> be a uniformly convex and smooth Banach space, let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i299.gif"/></inline-formula> be a closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i300.gif"/></inline-formula>, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i301.gif"/></inline-formula> be a closed and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i302.gif"/></inline-formula>-asympotically nonexpansive mapping from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i303.gif"/></inline-formula> into itself. Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i304.gif"/></inline-formula> is a closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i305.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
      </sec>
      <sec>
         <st>
            <p>3. A Modified Algorithm and Strong Convergence Theorems</p>
         </st>
         <p>Now we are in a proposition to prove the main results of this paper. In the sequel, we use the letter <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i306.gif"/></inline-formula> to denote an index set.</p>
         <p>Theorem 3.1. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i307.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i308.gif"/></inline-formula>, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i309.gif"/></inline-formula> be a family of closed and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i310.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i311.gif"/></inline-formula>. Assume that every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i312.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i313.gif"/></inline-formula> is asymptotically regular on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i314.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i315.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i316.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i317.gif"/></inline-formula> be real sequences in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i318.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i319.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i320.gif"/></inline-formula>. Define a sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i321.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i322.gif"/></inline-formula> in the following manner: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M31">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i323.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i324.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i325.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i326.gif"/></inline-formula> is the generalized projection from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i327.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i328.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>Firstly, we show that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i329.gif"/></inline-formula> is closed and convex for each <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i330.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>From the definition of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i331.gif"/></inline-formula>, it is obvious that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i332.gif"/></inline-formula> is closed for each <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i333.gif"/></inline-formula>. We show that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i334.gif"/></inline-formula> is convex for each <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i335.gif"/></inline-formula>. Observe that the set</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M32">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i336.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>can be written as </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M33">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i337.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>For <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i338.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i339.gif"/></inline-formula>, denote <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i340.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i341.gif"/></inline-formula>, and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i342.gif"/></inline-formula> by noting that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i343.gif"/></inline-formula> is convex, we have </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M34">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i344.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>So we obtain </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M35">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i345.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>which infers that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i346.gif"/></inline-formula>, so we get that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i347.gif"/></inline-formula> is convex for each <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i348.gif"/></inline-formula>. Thus <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i349.gif"/></inline-formula> is closed and convex for every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i350.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Secondly, we prove that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i351.gif"/></inline-formula>, for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i352.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Indeed, by noting that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i353.gif"/></inline-formula> is convex and using (2.2), we have, for any <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i354.gif"/></inline-formula> and all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i355.gif"/></inline-formula>, that</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M36">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i356.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>which infers that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i357.gif"/></inline-formula>, for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i358.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i359.gif"/></inline-formula>, and hence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i360.gif"/></inline-formula>. This proves that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i361.gif"/></inline-formula>, for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i362.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i363.gif"/></inline-formula>. </p>
         <p>Thirdly, we will show that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i364.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Since <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i365.gif"/></inline-formula> is a decreasing sequence of closed convex subsets of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i366.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i367.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonempty, it follows that</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M37">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i368.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>By Theorem 2.5, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i369.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i370.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Fourthly, we prove that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i371.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Since <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i372.gif"/></inline-formula>, from the definition of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i373.gif"/></inline-formula>, we get</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M38">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i374.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>From <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i375.gif"/></inline-formula>, one obtains <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i376.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i377.gif"/></inline-formula>, and it follows from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i378.gif"/></inline-formula>, for every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i379.gif"/></inline-formula> that we have </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M39">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i380.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>and hence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i381.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i382.gif"/></inline-formula> by Lemma 2.6. It follows that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i383.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i384.gif"/></inline-formula>. Since <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i385.gif"/></inline-formula> is uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on any bounded sets of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i386.gif"/></inline-formula>, we conclude that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M310">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i387.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i388.gif"/></inline-formula>. By the definition of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i389.gif"/></inline-formula> and the assumption on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i390.gif"/></inline-formula>, we deduce that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M311">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i391.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i392.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i393.gif"/></inline-formula>. So we get </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M312">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i394.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Since <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i395.gif"/></inline-formula>, we have <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i396.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i397.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Since <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i398.gif"/></inline-formula> is also uniformly norm-to-norm continuous on any bounded sets of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i399.gif"/></inline-formula>, we conclude that</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M313">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i400.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Noting that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i401.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i402.gif"/></inline-formula>, we have </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M314">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i403.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i404.gif"/></inline-formula>. Observe that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M315">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i405.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>By using (3.14), (3.15), and the asymptotic regularity of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i406.gif"/></inline-formula>, we have </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M316">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i407.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i408.gif"/></inline-formula>, that is, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i409.gif"/></inline-formula>. Now the closedness property of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i410.gif"/></inline-formula> gives that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i411.gif"/></inline-formula> is a common fixed point of the family <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i412.gif"/></inline-formula>, thus <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i413.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Finally, since <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i414.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i415.gif"/></inline-formula> is a nonempty closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i416.gif"/></inline-formula>, we conclude that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i417.gif"/></inline-formula>. This completes the proof.</p>
         <p>Remark 3.2. </p>
         <p>The boundedness assumption on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i418.gif"/></inline-formula> in Theorem ZGT can be dropped.</p>
         <p>Remark 3.3. </p>
         <p>The asymptotic regularity assumption on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i419.gif"/></inline-formula> in Theorem 3.1 can be weakened to the assumption that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i420.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i421.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Recall that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i422.gif"/></inline-formula> is called uniformly Lipschitzian continuous if there exists some <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i423.gif"/></inline-formula> such that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M317">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i424.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i425.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i426.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Remark 3.4. </p>
         <p>The assumption that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i427.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i428.gif"/></inline-formula> can be replaced by the uniform Lipschitz continuity of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i429.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>With above observations, we have the following convergence result. </p>
         <p>Corollary 3.5. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i430.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i431.gif"/></inline-formula>, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i432.gif"/></inline-formula> be a family of uniformly Lipschitzian continuous and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i433.gif"/></inline-formula>- <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i434.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i435.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i436.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i437.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i438.gif"/></inline-formula> be real sequences in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i439.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i440.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i441.gif"/></inline-formula>. Define a sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i442.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i443.gif"/></inline-formula> in the following manner:</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M318">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i444.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i445.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i446.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i447.gif"/></inline-formula> is the generalized projection from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i448.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i449.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>Following the proof lines of Theorem 3.1, we can prove that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i450.gif"/></inline-formula> is nonempty closed convex, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i451.gif"/></inline-formula> is closed convex, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i452.gif"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i453.gif"/></inline-formula> and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i454.gif"/></inline-formula>. At this point, it is sufficient to show that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i455.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i456.gif"/></inline-formula>. Again, from the proof lines of Theorem 3.1, we have the following conclusions:</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M319">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i457.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Observe that </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M320">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i458.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>so that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i459.gif"/></inline-formula> as <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i460.gif"/></inline-formula>. By Theorem 3.1, we have the desired conclusion. This completes the proof. </p>
         <p>When <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i461.gif"/></inline-formula> in Theorem 3.1, we obtain the following result. </p>
         <p>Corollary 3.6. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i462.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i463.gif"/></inline-formula>, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i464.gif"/></inline-formula> be a family of closed and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i465.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i466.gif"/></inline-formula>. Assume that every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i467.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i468.gif"/></inline-formula> is asymptotically regular on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i469.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i470.gif"/></inline-formula> be a real sequence in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i471.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i472.gif"/></inline-formula>. Define a sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i473.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i474.gif"/></inline-formula> in the following manner:</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M321">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i475.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i476.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i477.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i478.gif"/></inline-formula> is the generalized projection from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i479.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i480.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>When <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i481.gif"/></inline-formula> in Theorem 3.1, we obtain the following result. </p>
         <p>Corollary 3.7. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i482.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i483.gif"/></inline-formula>, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i484.gif"/></inline-formula> be a family of closed and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i485.gif"/></inline-formula>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i486.gif"/></inline-formula>. Assume that every <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i487.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i488.gif"/></inline-formula> is asymptotically regular on <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i489.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i490.gif"/></inline-formula> be a real sequence in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i491.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i492.gif"/></inline-formula>. Define a sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i493.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i494.gif"/></inline-formula> in the following manner:</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M322">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i495.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i496.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i497.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i498.gif"/></inline-formula> is the generalized projection from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i499.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i500.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>In the spirit of Theorem 3.1, we can prove the following strong convergence theorem.</p>
         <p>Theorem 3.8. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i501.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i502.gif"/></inline-formula>, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i503.gif"/></inline-formula> be a family of closed and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i504.gif"/></inline-formula>-nonexpansive mappings such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i505.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i506.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i507.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i508.gif"/></inline-formula> be real sequences in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i509.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i510.gif"/></inline-formula>, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i511.gif"/></inline-formula>. Define a sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i512.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i513.gif"/></inline-formula> in the following manner:</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M323">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i514.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i515.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i516.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i517.gif"/></inline-formula> is the generalized projection from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i518.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i519.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>Proof. </p>
         <p>Following the proof lines of Theorem 3.1, we have the following conclusions:</p>
         <p>(1) <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i520.gif"/></inline-formula> is a nonempty closed convex subset of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i521.gif"/></inline-formula>;</p>
         <p>(2) <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i522.gif"/></inline-formula> is closed covex for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i523.gif"/></inline-formula>;</p>
         <p>(3) <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i524.gif"/></inline-formula>, for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i525.gif"/></inline-formula>;</p>
         <p>(4) <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i526.gif"/></inline-formula>;</p>
         <p>(5) <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i527.gif"/></inline-formula> for all <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i528.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>The closedness property of <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i529.gif"/></inline-formula> together with (4) and (5) implies that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i530.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to a common fixed point <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i531.gif"/></inline-formula> of the family <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i532.gif"/></inline-formula>. As shown in Theorem 3.1, <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i533.gif"/></inline-formula>. This completes the proof.</p>
         <p>When <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i534.gif"/></inline-formula> in Theorem 3.8, we obtain the following result. </p>
         <p>Corollary 3.9. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i535.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i536.gif"/></inline-formula> be a family of closed and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i537.gif"/></inline-formula>-nonexpansive mappings such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i538.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i539.gif"/></inline-formula> be a real sequence in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i540.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i541.gif"/></inline-formula>. Define a sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i542.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i543.gif"/></inline-formula> in the following manner:</p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M324">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i544.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i545.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i546.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i547.gif"/></inline-formula> is the generalized projection from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i548.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i549.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
         <p>When <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i550.gif"/></inline-formula> in Theorem 3.8, we obtain the following result. </p>
         <p>Corollary 3.10. </p>
         <p>Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i551.gif"/></inline-formula> be a nonempty closed convex subset of a uniformly convex and uniformly smooth Banach space <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i552.gif"/></inline-formula>, and let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i553.gif"/></inline-formula> be a family of closed and <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i554.gif"/></inline-formula>nonexpansive mappings such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i555.gif"/></inline-formula>. Let <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i556.gif"/></inline-formula> be a real sequence in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i557.gif"/></inline-formula> such that <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i558.gif"/></inline-formula>. Define a sequence <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i559.gif"/></inline-formula> in <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i560.gif"/></inline-formula> in the following manner: </p>
         <p>
            <display-formula id="M325">
               <graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i561.gif"/>
            </display-formula>
         </p>
         <p>Then <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i562.gif"/></inline-formula> converges strongly to <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i563.gif"/></inline-formula>, where <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i564.gif"/></inline-formula> is the generalized projection from <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i565.gif"/></inline-formula> onto <inline-formula><graphic file="1687-1812-2010-170701-i566.gif"/></inline-formula>.</p>
      </sec>
   </bdy>
   <bm>
      <ack>
         <sec>
            <st>
               <p>Acknowledgments</p>
            </st>
            <p>This project is supported by the Zhangjiakou city technology research and development projects foundation (0911008B-3), Hebei education department research projects foundation (2006103) and Hebei north university research projects foundation (2009008).</p>
         </sec>
      </ack>
      <refgrp><bibl id="B1"><title><p>A fixed point theorem for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Goebel</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Kirk</snm><fnm>WA</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society</source><pubdate>1972</pubdate><volume>35</volume><fpage>171</fpage><lpage>174</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1090/S0002-9939-1972-0298500-3</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B2"><title><p>Iterative construction of fixed points of asymptotically nonexpansive mappings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Schu</snm><fnm>J</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>1991</pubdate><volume>158</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>407</fpage><lpage>413</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0022-247X(91)90245-U</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B3"><title><p>A new iterative algorithm for approximating common fixed points for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhou</snm><fnm>HY</fnm></au><au><snm>Cho</snm><fnm>YJ</fnm></au><au><snm>Kang</snm><fnm>SM</fnm></au></aug><source>Fixed Point Theory and Applications</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>2007</volume><lpage>10</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B4"><aug><au><snm>Haugazeau</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au></aug><source>Sur les in&#233;quations variationnelles et la minimisation de fonctionnelles convexes, Ph.D. thesis</source><publisher>Universit&#233; de Paris, Paris, France</publisher><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="pmcid">3187950</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid">21991236</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B5"><title><p>A weak-to-strong convergence principle for Fej&#233;r-monotone methods in Hilbert spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Bauschke</snm><fnm>HH</fnm></au><au><snm>Combettes</snm><fnm>PL</fnm></au></aug><source>Mathematics of Operations Research</source><pubdate>2001</pubdate><volume>26</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>248</fpage><lpage>264</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1287/moor.26.2.248.10558</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B6"><title><p>Strong convergence theorems for nonexpansive mappings and nonexpansive semigroups</p></title><aug><au><snm>Nakajo</snm><fnm>K</fnm></au><au><snm>Takahashi</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><volume>279</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>372</fpage><lpage>379</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/S0022-247X(02)00458-4</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B7"><title><p>Strong convergence of the CQ method for fixed point iteration processes</p></title><aug><au><snm>Martinez-Yanes</snm><fnm>C</fnm></au><au><snm>Xu</snm><fnm>H-K</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>64</volume><issue>11</issue><fpage>2400</fpage><lpage>2411</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.na.2005.08.018</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21967941</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B8"><title><p>A strong convergence theorem for relatively nonexpansive mappings in a Banach space</p></title><aug><au><snm>Matsushita</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Takahashi</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Approximation Theory</source><pubdate>2005</pubdate><volume>134</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>257</fpage><lpage>266</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.jat.2005.02.007</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B9"><title><p>Strong convergence of modified Ishikawa iterations for nonlinear mappings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Su</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Qin</snm><fnm>X</fnm></au></aug><source>Proceedings of Indian Academy of Sciences</source><pubdate>2007</pubdate><volume>117</volume><issue>1</issue><fpage>97</fpage><lpage>107</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s12044-007-0008-y</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B10"><title><p>Strong convergence of monotone hybrid algorithm for hemi-relatively nonexpansive mappings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Su</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Wang</snm><fnm>D</fnm></au><au><snm>Shang</snm><fnm>M</fnm></au></aug><source>Fixed Point Theory and Applications</source><pubdate>2008</pubdate><volume>2008</volume><lpage>8</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B11"><title><p>Convergence theorems of a modified hybrid algorithm for a family of quasi-<it>&#966;</it>-asymptotically nonexpansive mappings</p></title><aug><au><snm>Zhou</snm><fnm>H</fnm></au><au><snm>Gao</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au><au><snm>Tan</snm><fnm>B</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computing</source><pubdate>2010</pubdate><volume>32</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>453</fpage><lpage>464</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1007/s12190-009-0263-4</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B12"><title><p>Strong convergence of modified Mann iterations for asymptotically nonexpansive mappings and semigroups</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kim</snm><fnm>T-H</fnm></au><au><snm>Xu</snm><fnm>H-K</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods &amp; Applications</source><pubdate>2006</pubdate><volume>64</volume><issue>5</issue><fpage>1140</fpage><lpage>1152</lpage><xrefbib><pubidlist><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.na.2005.05.059</pubid><pubid idtype="pmpid" link="fulltext">21967941</pubid></pubidlist></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B13"><title><p>On a hybrid method for a family of relatively nonexpansive mappings in a Banach space</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kimura</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Takahashi</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Journal of Mathematical Analysis and Applications</source><pubdate>2009</pubdate><volume>357</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>356</fpage><lpage>363</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/j.jmaa.2009.03.052</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B14"><title><p>Metric and generalized projection operators in Banach spaces: properties and applications</p></title><aug><au><snm>Alber</snm><fnm>YI</fnm></au></aug><source>Theory and Applications of Nonlinear Operators of Accretive and Monotone Type</source><publisher>Dekker, New York, NY, USA</publisher><editor>Kartsatos AG</editor><pubdate>1996</pubdate><volume>178</volume><fpage>15</fpage><lpage>50</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B15"><title><p>An iterative method for solving a class of nonlinear operator equations in Banach spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Alber</snm><fnm>YaI</fnm></au><au><snm>Reich</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au></aug><source>Panamerican Mathematical Journal</source><pubdate>1994</pubdate><volume>4</volume><issue>2</issue><fpage>39</fpage><lpage>54</lpage></bibl><bibl id="B16"><title><p>Strong convergence of a proximal-type algorithm in a Banach space</p></title><aug><au><snm>Kamimura</snm><fnm>S</fnm></au><au><snm>Takahashi</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>SIAM Journal on Optimization</source><pubdate>2002</pubdate><volume>13</volume><issue>3</issue><fpage>938</fpage><lpage>945</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1137/S105262340139611X</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B17"><aug><au><snm>Cioranescu</snm><fnm>I</fnm></au></aug><source>Geometry of Banach Spaces, Duality Mappings and Nonlinear Problems, Mathematics and Its Applications</source><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands</publisher><pubdate>1990</pubdate><volume>62</volume><fpage>xiv+260</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B18"><aug><au><snm>Takahashi</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Nonlinear Functional Analysis, Fixed Point Theory and Its Application</source><publisher>Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama, Japan</publisher><pubdate>2000</pubdate><fpage>iv+276</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B19"><title><p>Convergence of convex sets and of solutions of variational inequalities</p></title><aug><au><snm>Mosco</snm><fnm>U</fnm></au></aug><source>Advances in Mathematics</source><pubdate>1969</pubdate><volume>3</volume><fpage>510</fpage><lpage>585</lpage><xrefbib><pubid idtype="doi">10.1016/0001-8708(69)90009-7</pubid></xrefbib></bibl><bibl id="B20"><aug><au><snm>Beer</snm><fnm>G</fnm></au></aug><source>Topologies on Closed and Closed Convex Sets, Mathematics and Its Applications</source><publisher>Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands</publisher><pubdate>1993</pubdate><volume>268</volume><fpage>xii+340</fpage></bibl><bibl id="B21"><title><p>Convergence theorems for generalized projections and maximal monotone operators in Banach spaces</p></title><aug><au><snm>Ibaraki</snm><fnm>T</fnm></au><au><snm>Kimura</snm><fnm>Y</fnm></au><au><snm>Takahashi</snm><fnm>W</fnm></au></aug><source>Abstract and Applied Analysis</source><pubdate>2003</pubdate><issue>10</issue><fpage>621</fpage><lpage>629</lpage></bibl></refgrp>
   </bm>
</art>