SpringerOpen Newsletter

Receive periodic news and updates relating to SpringerOpen.

Open Access Research

Discussion on some coupled fixed point theorems

Bessem Samet1*, Erdal Karapınar2, Hassen Aydi3 and Vesna Ćojbas̆ić Rajić4

Author Affiliations

1 Department of Mathematics, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia

2 Department of Mathematics, Atılım University, İncek, Ankara, 06836, Turkey

3 Institut Supérieur d’Informatique et des Technologies de Communication de Hammam Sousse, Université de Sousse, Route GP1-4011, H. Sousse, Tunisie

4 Faculty of Economics, University of Belgrade, Kamenička 6, Beograd, 11000, Serbia

For all author emails, please log on.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2013, 2013:50  doi:10.1186/1687-1812-2013-50

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2013/1/50


Received:29 August 2012
Accepted:18 February 2013
Published:10 March 2013

© 2013 Samet et al.; licensee Springer

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

In this paper, we show that, unexpectedly, most of the coupled fixed point theorems (on ordered metric spaces) are in fact immediate consequences of well-known fixed point theorems in the literature.

MSC: 47H10, 54H25.

Keywords:
coupled fixed point; fixed point; ordered set; metric space

1 Introduction

In recent years, there has been recent interest in establishing fixed point theorems on ordered metric spaces with a contractivity condition which holds for all points that are related by partial ordering.

In [1], Ran and Reurings established the following fixed point theorem that extends the Banach contraction principle to the setting of ordered metric spaces.

Theorem 1.1 (Ran and Reurings [1])

Let ( X , ) be an ordered set endowed with a metricdand T : X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) Tis continuous nondecreasing (with respect to ⪯);

(iii) there exists x 0 X such that x 0 T x 0 ;

(iv) there exists a constant k ( 0 , 1 ) such that for all x , y X with x y ,

d ( T x , T y ) k d ( x , y ) .

ThenThas a fixed point. Moreover, if for all ( x , y ) X × X there exists a z X such that x z and y z , we obtain uniqueness of the fixed point.

Nieto and López [2] extended the above result for a mapping T not necessarily continuous by assuming an additional hypothesis on ( X , , d ) .

Theorem 1.2 (Nieto and López [2])

Let ( X , ) be an ordered set endowed with a metricdand T : X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) if a nondecreasing sequence { x n } inXconverges to some point x X , then x n x for alln;

(iii) Tis nondecreasing;

(iv) there exists x 0 X such that x 0 T x 0 ;

(v) there exists a constant k ( 0 , 1 ) such that for all x , y X with x y ,

d ( T x , T y ) k d ( x , y ) .

ThenThas a fixed point. Moreover, if for all ( x , y ) X × X there exists a z X such that x z and y z , we obtain uniqueness of the fixed point.

Theorems 1.1 and 1.2 are extended and generalized by many authors. Before presenting some of theses results, we need to introduce some functional sets.

Denote by Φ the set of functions φ : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) satisfying the following conditions:

( Φ 1 ) φ is continuous nondecreasing;

( Φ 2 ) φ 1 ( { 0 } ) = { 0 } .

Denote by S the set of functions β : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , 1 ) satisfying the following condition:

β ( t n ) 1 implies t n 0 .

Denote by Θ the set of functions θ : [ 0 , ) 2 [ 0 , 1 ) which satisfy the condition:

θ ( s n , t n ) 1 implies t n , s n 0 .

Denote by Ψ the set of functions ψ : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) satisfying the following conditions:

( Ψ 1 ) ψ ( t ) < t for all t > 0 ;

( Ψ 2 ) lim r t + ψ ( r ) < t .

In [3], Harjani and Sadarangani established the following results.

Theorem 1.3 (Harjani and Sadarangani [3])

Let ( X , ) be an ordered set endowed with a metricdand T : X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) Tis continuous nondecreasing;

(iii) there exists x 0 X such that x 0 T x 0 ;

(iv) there exist φ , ψ Φ such that for all x , y X with x y ,

ψ ( d ( T x , T y ) ) ψ ( d ( x , y ) ) φ ( d ( x , y ) ) .

ThenThas a fixed point. Moreover, if for all ( x , y ) X × X there exists a z X such that x z and y z , we obtain uniqueness of the fixed point.

Theorem 1.4 (Harjani and Sadarangani [3])

Let ( X , ) be an ordered set endowed with a metricdand T : X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) if a nondecreasing sequence { x n } inXconverges to some point x X , then x n x for alln;

(iii) Tis nondecreasing;

(iv) there exists x 0 X such that x 0 T x 0 ;

(v) there exist φ , ψ Φ such that for all x , y X with x y ,

ψ ( d ( T x , T y ) ) ψ ( d ( x , y ) ) φ ( d ( x , y ) ) .

ThenThas a fixed point. Moreover, if for all ( x , y ) X × X there exists a z X such that x z and y z , we obtain uniqueness of the fixed point.

In [4], Amini-Harandi and Emami established the following results.

Theorem 1.5 (Amini-Harandi and Emami [4])

Let ( X , ) be an ordered set endowed with a metricdand T : X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) Tis continuous nondecreasing;

(iii) there exists x 0 X such that x 0 T x 0 ;

(iv) there exists β S such that for all x , y X with x y ,

d ( T x , T y ) β ( d ( x , y ) ) d ( x , y ) .

ThenThas a fixed point. Moreover, if for all ( x , y ) X × X there exists a z X such that x z and y z , we obtain uniqueness of the fixed point.

Theorem 1.6 (Amini-Harandi and Emami [4])

Let ( X , ) be an ordered set endowed with a metricdand T : X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) if a nondecreasing sequence { x n } inXconverges to some point x X , then x n x for alln;

(iii) Tis nondecreasing;

(iv) there exists x 0 X such that x 0 T x 0 ;

(v) there exists β S such that for all x , y X with x y ,

d ( T x , T y ) β ( d ( x , y ) ) d ( x , y ) .

ThenThas a fixed point. Moreover, if for all ( x , y ) X × X there exists a z X such that x z and y z , we obtain uniqueness of the fixed point.

Remark 1.1 Jachymski [5] established that Theorem 1.5 (resp. Theorem 1.6) follows from Theorem 1.3 (resp. Theorem 1.4).

Remark 1.2 Theorems 1.3 and 1.4 hold if φ : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) satisfies only the following conditions: φ is lower semi-continuous and φ 1 ( { 0 } ) = { 0 } (see, for example, [6]).

The following results are special cases of Theorem 2.2 in [7].

Theorem 1.7 (Ćirić et al.[7])

Let ( X , ) be an ordered set endowed with a metricdand T : X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) Tis continuous nondecreasing;

(iii) there exists x 0 X such that x 0 T x 0 ;

(iv) there exists a continuous function φ : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) with φ ( t ) < t for all t > 0 such that for all x , y X with x y ,

d ( T x , T y ) φ ( d ( x , y ) ) .

ThenThas a fixed point.

Theorem 1.8 (Ćirić et al.[7])

Let ( X , ) be an ordered set endowed with a metricdand T : X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) if a nondecreasing sequence { x n } inXconverges to some point x X , then x n x for alln;

(iii) Tis nondecreasing;

(iv) there exists x 0 X such that x 0 T x 0 ;

(v) there exists a continuous function φ : [ 0 , ) [ 0 , ) with φ ( t ) < t for all t > 0 such that for all x , y X with x y ,

d ( T x , T y ) φ ( d ( x , y ) ) .

ThenThas a fixed point.

Remark 1.3 Theorems 1.7 and 1.8 hold if we suppose that φ Ψ (see, for example, [8]).

Let X be a nonempty set and F : X × X X be a given mapping. We say that ( x , y ) X × X is a coupled fixed point of F if

x = F ( x , y ) and y = F ( y , x ) .

In [9], Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham established some coupled fixed point theorems on ordered metric spaces and applied the obtained results to the study of existence and uniqueness of solutions to a class of periodic boundary value problems. The obtained results in [9] have been extended and generalized by many authors (see, for example, [8,10-23]).

In this paper, we will prove that most of the coupled fixed point theorems are in fact immediate consequences of well-known fixed point theorems in the literature.

2 Main results

Let ( X , ) be a partially ordered set endowed with a metric d and F : X × X X be a given mapping. We endow the product set X × X with the partial order:

( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X , ( x , y ) 2 ( u , v ) x u , y v .

Definition 2.1F is said to have the mixed monotone property if F ( x , y ) is monotone nondecreasing in x and is monotone non-increasing in y, that is, for any x , y X ,

x 1 , x 2 X , x 1 x 2 F ( x 1 , y ) F ( x 2 , y ) ; y 1 , y 2 X , y 1 y 2 F ( x , y 1 ) F ( x , y 2 ) .

Let Y = X × X . It is easy to show that the mappings η , δ : Y × Y [ 0 , ) defined by

η ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) ) = d ( x , u ) + d ( y , v ) ; δ ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) ) = max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) }

for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) Y , are metrics on Y.

Now, define the mapping T : Y Y by

T ( x , y ) = ( F ( x , y ) , F ( y , x ) ) for all  ( x , y ) Y .

It is easy to show the following.

Lemma 2.1The following properties hold:

(a) ( X , d ) is complete if and only if ( Y , η ) and ( Y , δ ) are complete;

(b) Fhas the mixed monotone property if and only ifTis monotone nondecreasing with respect to2;

(c) ( x , y ) X × X is a coupled fixed point ofFif and only if ( x , y ) is a fixed point ofT.

2.1 Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham’s coupled fixed point results

We present the obtained results in [9] in the following theorem.

Theorem 2.1 (see Bhaskar and Lakshmikantham [9])

Let ( X , ) be a partially ordered set endowed with a metricd. Let F : X × X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) Fhas the mixed monotone property;

(iii) Fis continuous orXhas the following properties:

( X 1 ) if a nondecreasing sequence { x n } inXconverges to some point x X , then x n x for alln,

( X 2 ) if a decreasing sequence { y n } inXconverges to some point y X , then y n y for alln;

(iv) there exist x 0 , y 0 X such that x 0 F ( x 0 , y 0 ) and y 0 F ( y 0 , x 0 ) ;

(v) there exists a constant k ( 0 , 1 ) such that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v ,

d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) k 2 [ d ( x , u ) + d ( y , v ) ] .

ThenFhas a coupled fixed point ( x , y ) X × X . Moreover, if for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X there exists ( z 1 , z 2 ) X × X such that ( x , y ) 2 ( z 1 , z 2 ) and ( u , v ) 2 ( z 1 , z 2 ) , we have uniqueness of the coupled fixed point and x = y .

We will prove the following result.

Theorem 2.2Theorem 2.1 follows from Theorems 1.1 and 1.2.

Proof From (v), for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v , we have

d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) k 2 [ d ( x , u ) + d ( y , v ) ]

and

d ( F ( v , u ) , F ( y , x ) ) k 2 [ d ( x , u ) + d ( y , v ) ] .

This implies that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v ,

d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) + d ( F ( v , u ) , F ( y , x ) ) k [ d ( x , u ) + d ( y , v ) ] ,

that is,

η ( T ( x , y ) , T ( u , v ) ) k η ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) )

for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) Y with ( x , y ) 2 ( u , v ) . From Lemma 2.1, since ( X , d ) is complete, ( Y , η ) is also complete. Since F has the mixed monotone property, T is a nondecreasing mapping with respect to ⪯2. From (iv), we have ( x 0 , y 0 ) 2 T ( x 0 , y 0 ) . Now, if F is continuous, then T is continuous. In this case, applying Theorem 1.1, we get that T has a fixed point, which implies from Lemma 2.1 that F has a coupled fixed point. If conditions ( X 1 ) and ( X 2 ) are satisfied, then Y satisfies the following property: if a nondecreasing (with respect to ⪯2) sequence { u n } in Y converges to some point u Y , then u n 2 u for all n. Applying Theorem 1.2, we get that T has a fixed point, which implies that F has a coupled fixed point. If, in addition, we suppose that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X there exists ( z 1 , z 2 ) X × X such that ( x , y ) 2 ( z 1 , z 2 ) and ( u , v ) 2 ( z 1 , z 2 ) , from the last part of Theorems 1.1 and 1.2, we obtain the uniqueness of the fixed point of T, which implies the uniqueness of the coupled fixed point of F. Now, let ( x , y ) X × X be a unique coupled fixed point of F. Since ( y , x ) is also a coupled fixed point of F, we get x = y . □

2.2 Harjani, López and Sadarangani’s coupled fixed point results

We present the results obtained in [16] in the following theorem.

Theorem 2.3 (see Harjani et al.[16])

Let ( X , ) be a partially ordered set endowed with a metricd. Let F : X × X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) Fhas the mixed monotone property;

(iii) Fis continuous orXhas the following properties:

( X 1 ) if a nondecreasing sequence { x n } inXconverges to some point x X , then x n x for alln,

( X 2 ) if a decreasing sequence { y n } inXconverges to some point y X , then y n y for alln;

(iv) there exist x 0 , y 0 X such that x 0 F ( x 0 , y 0 ) and y 0 F ( y 0 , x 0 ) ;

(v) there exist ψ , φ Φ such that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v ,

ψ ( d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) ) ψ ( max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) } ) φ ( max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) } ) .

ThenFhas a coupled fixed point ( x , y ) X × X . Moreover, if for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X there exists ( z 1 , z 2 ) X × X such that ( x , y ) 2 ( z 1 , z 2 ) and ( u , v ) 2 ( z 1 , z 2 ) , we have uniqueness of the coupled fixed point and x = y .

We will prove the following result.

Theorem 2.4Theorem 2.3 follows from Theorems 1.3 and 1.4.

Proof From (v), for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v , we have

ψ ( d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) ) ψ ( max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) } ) φ ( max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) } )

and

ψ ( d ( F ( v , u ) , F ( y , x ) ) ) ψ ( max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) } ) φ ( max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) } ) .

This implies (since ψ is nondecreasing) that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v ,

ψ ( max { d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) , d ( F ( v , u ) , F ( y , x ) ) } ) ψ ( max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) } ) φ ( max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) } ) ,

that is,

ψ ( δ ( T ( x , y ) , T ( u , v ) ) ) ψ ( δ ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) ) ) φ ( δ ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) ) )

for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) Y with ( x , y ) 2 ( u , v ) . Thus we proved that the mapping T satisfies the condition (iv) (resp. (v)) of Theorem 1.3 (resp. Theorem 1.4). The rest of the proof is similar to the above proof. □

2.3 Lakshmikantham and Ćirić’s coupled fixed point results

In [8], putting g = i X (the identity mapping), we obtain the following result.

Theorem 2.5 (see Lakshmikantham and Ćirić’s [8])

Let ( X , ) be a partially ordered set endowed with a metricd. Let F : X × X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) Fhas the mixed monotone property;

(iii) Fis continuous orXhas the following properties:

( X 1 ) if a nondecreasing sequence { x n } inXconverges to some point x X , then x n x for alln,

( X 2 ) if a decreasing sequence { y n } inXconverges to some point y X , then y n y for alln;

(iv) there exist x 0 , y 0 X such that x 0 F ( x 0 , y 0 ) and y 0 F ( y 0 , x 0 ) ;

(v) there exists φ Ψ such that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v ,

d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) φ ( d ( x , u ) + d ( y , v ) 2 ) .

ThenFhas a coupled fixed point.

We will prove the following result.

Theorem 2.6Theorem 2.5 follows from Theorems 1.7 and 1.8.

Proof From (v), for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v , we have

d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) φ ( d ( x , u ) + d ( y , v ) 2 )

and

d ( F ( v , u ) , F ( y , x ) ) φ ( d ( x , u ) + d ( y , v ) 2 ) .

This implies that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v ,

d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) + d ( F ( v , u ) , F ( y , x ) ) 2 φ ( d ( x , u ) + d ( y , v ) 2 ) ,

that is,

η ( T ( x , y ) , T ( u , v ) ) φ ( η ( ( x , u ) , ( y , v ) ) )

for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) Y with ( x , y ) 2 ( u , v ) . Here, η : Y × Y [ 0 , ) is the metric on Y given by

η ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) ) = η ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) ) 2 for all  ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) Y .

Thus we proved that the mapping T satisfies the condition (iv) (resp. (v)) of Theorem 1.7 (resp. Theorem 1.8). Then T has a fixed point, which implies that F has a coupled fixed point. □

2.4 Luong and Thuan’s coupled fixed point results

Luong and Thuan [18] presented a coupled fixed point result involving an ICS mapping.

Definition 2.2 Let ( X , d ) be a metric space. A mapping S : X X is said to be ICS if S is injective, continuous and has the property: for every sequence { x n } in X, if { S x n } is convergent, then { x n } is also convergent.

We have the following result.

Lemma 2.2Let ( X , d ) be a metric space and S : X X be an ICS mapping. Then the mapping d S : X × X [ 0 , ) defined by

d S ( x , y ) = d ( S x , S y ) for all   x , y X ,

is a metric onX. Moreover, if ( X , d ) is complete, then ( X , d S ) is also complete.

Proof Let us prove that d S is a metric on X. Let x , y X such that d S ( x , y ) = 0 . This implies that S x = S y . Since S is injective, we obtain that x = y . Other properties of the metric can be easily checked. Now, suppose that ( X , d ) is complete and let { x n } be a Cauchy sequence in the metric space ( X , d S ) . This implies that { S x n } is Cauchy in ( X , d ) . Since ( X , d ) is complete, { S x n } is convergent in ( X , d ) to some point y X . Since S is an ICS mapping, { x n } is also convergent in ( X , d ) to some point x X . On the other hand, the continuity of S implies the convergence of { S x n } in ( X , d ) to Sx. By the uniqueness of the limit in ( X , d ) , we get that y = S x , which implies that d S ( x n , x ) 0 as n . Thus { x n } is a convergent sequence in ( X , d S ) . This proves that ( X , d S ) is complete. □

The obtained result in [18] is the following.

Theorem 2.7 (see Luong and Thuan [18])

Let ( X , ) be a partially ordered set endowed with a metricd. Let S : X X be an ICS mapping. Let F : X × X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) Fhas the mixed monotone property;

(iii) Fis continuous orXhas the following properties:

( X 1 ) if a nondecreasing sequence { x n } inXconverges to some point x X , then x n x for alln,

( X 2 ) if a decreasing sequence { y n } inXconverges to some point y X , then y n y for alln;

(iv) there exist x 0 , y 0 X such that x 0 F ( x 0 , y 0 ) and y 0 F ( y 0 , x 0 ) ;

(v) there exists ψ Ψ such that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v ,

d ( S F ( x , y ) , S F ( u , v ) ) 1 2 ψ ( d ( S x , S u ) + d ( S y , S v ) ) .

ThenFhas a coupled fixed point.

We will prove the following result.

Theorem 2.8Theorem 2.7 follows from Theorems 1.7 and 1.8.

Proof The condition (v) implies that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v ,

d S ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) + d S ( F ( v , u ) , F ( y , x ) ) ψ ( d S ( x , u ) + d S ( y , v ) ) ,

that is,

η S ( T ( x , y ) , T ( u , v ) ) ψ ( η S ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) ) ) ,

for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) Y with ( x , y ) 2 ( u , v ) , where η S is the metric (see Lemma 2.2) on Y defined by

η S ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) ) = d S ( x , u ) + d S ( y , v ) for all  ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) Y .

Thus we proved that the mapping T satisfies the condition (iv) (resp. (v)) of Theorem 1.7 (resp. Theorem 1.8). Then T has a fixed point, which implies that F has a coupled fixed point. □

2.5 Berind’s coupled fixed point results

The following result was established in [11].

Theorem 2.9 (see Berinde [11])

Let ( X , ) be a partially ordered set endowed with a metric d. Let F : X × X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) Fhas the mixed monotone property;

(iii) Fis continuous orXhas the following properties:

( X 1 ) if a nondecreasing sequence { x n } inXconverges to some point x X , then x n x for alln,

( X 2 ) if a decreasing sequence { y n } inXconverges to some point y X , then y n y for alln;

(iv) there exist x 0 , y 0 X such that x 0 F ( x 0 , y 0 ) and y 0 F ( y 0 , x 0 ) ;

(v) there exists a constant k ( 0 , 1 ) such that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v ,

d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) + d ( F ( y , x ) , F ( v , u ) ) k [ d ( x , u ) + d ( y , v ) ] .

ThenFhas a coupled fixed point ( x , y ) X × X . Moreover, if for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X there exists ( z 1 , z 2 ) X × X such that ( x , y ) 2 ( z 1 , z 2 ) and ( u , v ) 2 ( z 1 , z 2 ) , we have uniqueness of the coupled fixed point and x = y .

We have the following result.

Theorem 2.10Theorem 2.9 follows from Theorems 1.1 and 1.2.

Proof From the condition (v), the mapping T satisfies

η ( T ( x , y ) , T ( u , v ) ) k η ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) )

for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) Y with ( x , y ) 2 ( u , v ) . Thus we proved that the mapping T satisfies the condition (iv) (resp. (v)) of Theorem 1.1 (resp. Theorem 1.2). Then T has a fixed point, which implies that F has a coupled fixed point. The rest of the proof is similar to the above proofs. □

2.6 Rasouli and Bahrampour’s coupled fixed point results

Theorem 2.11 (see Rasouli and Bahrampour [20])

Let ( X , ) be a partially ordered set endowed with a metricd. Let F : X × X X be a given mapping. Suppose that the following conditions hold:

(i) ( X , d ) is complete;

(ii) Fhas the mixed monotone property;

(iii) Fis continuous orXhas the following properties:

( X 1 ) if a nondecreasing sequence { x n } inXconverges to some point x X , then x n x for alln,

( X 2 ) if a decreasing sequence { y n } inXconverges to some point y X , then y n y for alln;

(iv) there exist x 0 , y 0 X such that x 0 F ( x 0 , y 0 ) and y 0 F ( y 0 , x 0 ) ;

(v) there exists β S such that for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X with x u and y v ,

d ( F ( x , y ) , F ( u , v ) ) β ( max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) } ) max { d ( x , u ) , d ( y , v ) } .

ThenFhas a coupled fixed point ( x , y ) X × X . Moreover, if for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) X × X there exists ( z 1 , z 2 ) X × X such that ( x , y ) 2 ( z 1 , z 2 ) and ( u , v ) 2 ( z 1 , z 2 ) , we have uniqueness of the coupled fixed point and x = y .

We have the following result.

Theorem 2.12Theorem 2.11 follows from Theorems 1.5 and 1.6.

Proof From the condition (v), the mapping T satisfies

δ ( T ( x , y ) , T ( u , v ) ) β ( δ ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) ) ) δ ( ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) )

for all ( x , y ) , ( u , v ) Y with ( x , y ) 2 ( u , v ) . Thus we proved that the mapping T satisfies the condition (iv) (resp. (v)) of Theorem 1.5 (resp. Theorem 1.6). Then T has a fixed point, which implies that F has a coupled fixed point. The rest of the proof is similar to the above proofs. □

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the Research Center, College of Science, King Saud University.

References

  1. Ran, ACM, Reurings, MCB: A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations . Proc. Am. Math. Soc.. 132, 1435–1443 (2004). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  2. Nieto, JJ, Rodríguez-López, R: Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations . Order. 22, 223–239 (2005). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  3. Harjani, J, Sadarangani, K: Generalized contractions in partially ordered metric spaces and applications to ordinary differential equations . Nonlinear Anal.. 72, 1188–1197 (2010). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  4. Amini-Harandi, A, Emami, H: A fixed point theorem for contraction type maps in partially ordered metric spaces and application to ordinary differential equations . Nonlinear Anal.. 72, 2238–2242 (2010). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  5. Jachymski, J: Equivalent conditions for generalized contractions on (ordered) metric spaces . Nonlinear Anal.. 74(3), 768–774 (2011). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  6. Cherichi, M, Samet, B: Fixed point theorems on ordered gauge spaces with applications to nonlinear integral equations . Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2012, (2012) Article ID 13

  7. Ćirić, L, Cakić, N, Rajović, M, Ume, JS: Monotone generalized nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric spaces . Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2008, (2008) Article ID 131294, 11 pages

  8. Lakshmikantham, V, Ćirić, L: Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in partially ordered metric spaces . Nonlinear Anal.. 70(12), 4341–4349 (2009). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  9. Bhaskar, TG, Lakshmikantham, V: Fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces and applications . Nonlinear Anal.. 65, 1379–1393 (2006). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  10. Amini-Harandi, A: Coupled and tripled fixed point theory in partially ordered metric spaces with application to initial value problem . Math. Comput. Model.. 57(9-10), 2343–2348 (2013). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  11. Berinde, V: Generalized coupled fixed point theorems for mixed monotone mappings in partially ordered metric spaces . Nonlinear Anal.. 74, 7347–7355 (2011). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  12. Berinde, V: Coupled fixed point theorems for Φ-contractive mixed monotone mappings in partially ordered metric spaces . Nonlinear Anal.. 75, 3218–3228 (2012). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  13. Ćirić, L, Agarwal, RP, Samet, B: Mixed monotone-generalized contractions in partially ordered probabilistic metric spaces . Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2011, (2011) Article ID 56

  14. Ding, H-S, Li, L, Radenović, S: Coupled coincidence point theorems for generalized nonlinear contraction in partially ordered metric spaces . Fixed Point Theory Appl.. 2012, (2012) Article ID 96

  15. Golubović, Z, Kadelburg, Z, Radenović, S: Coupled coincidence points of mappings in ordered partial metric spaces . Abstr. Appl. Anal.. 2012, (2012) Article ID 192581, 18 pages

  16. Harjani, J, López, B, Sadarangani, K: Fixed point theorems for mixed monotone operators and applications to integral equations . Nonlinear Anal.. 74, 1749–1760 (2011). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  17. Karapınar, E: Coupled fixed point theorems for nonlinear contractions in cone metric spaces . Comput. Math. Appl.. 59, 3656–3668 (2010). Publisher Full Text OpenURL

  18. Luong, NV, Thuan, NX: Coupled fixed point theorems in partially ordered metric spaces depended on another function . Bull. Math. Anal. Appl.. 3(3), 129–140 (2011)

  19. Radenović, S, Pantelić, S, Salimi, P, Vujaković, J: A note on some tripled coincidence point results in G-metric spaces . Int. J. Math. Sci. Eng. Appl.. 6(VI), 23–38 (2012)

  20. Rasouli, SH, Bahrampour, M: A remark on the coupled fixed point theorems for mixed monotone operators in partially ordered metric spaces . J. Math. Comput. Sci.. 3(2), 246–261 (2011)

  21. Samet, B: Coupled fixed point theorems for a generalized Meir-Keeler contraction in partially ordered metric spaces . Nonlinear Anal.. 74, 4508–4517 (2010)

  22. Samet, B, Yazidi, H: Coupled fixed point theorems in partially ordered ε-chainable metric spaces . J. Math. Comput. Sci.. 1(3), 142–151 (2010)

  23. Shatanawi, W: Coupled fixed point theorems in generalized metric spaces . Hacet. J. Math. Stat.. 40(3), 441–447 (2011)