Research

# Approximating fixed points of amenable semigroup and infinite family of nonexpansive mappings and solving systems of variational inequalities and systems of equilibrium problems

Hossein Piri

Author Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, University of Bonab 55517-61167 Bonab, Iran

Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2012, 2012:99 doi:10.1186/1687-1812-2012-99

 Received: 31 December 2011 Accepted: 16 June 2012 Published: 16 June 2012

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

### Abstract

We introduce an iterative scheme for finding a common element of the set of solutions for systems of equilibrium problems and systems of variational inequalities and the set of common fixed points for an infinite family and left amenable semigroup of nonexpansive mappings in Hilbert spaces. The results presented in this paper mainly extend and improved some well-known results in the literature.

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 47H09; 47H10; 47H20; 43A07; 47J25.

##### Keywords:
common fixed point; strong convergence; amenable semigroup; explicit iterative; system of equilibrium problem.

### 1. Introduction

Let H be a real Hilbert space and let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of H.

Let A: C H be a nonlinear mapping. The classical variational inequality problem is to fined x C such that

(1)

The set of solution of (1) is denoted by VI(C, A), i.e.,

(2)

Recall that the following definitions:

(1) A is called monotone if

(2) A is called α-strongly monotone if there exists a positive constant α such that

(3) A is called μ-Lipschitzian if there exist a positive constant μ such that

(4) A is called α-inverse strongly monotone, if there exists a positive real number α > 0

such that

It is obvious that any α-inverse strongly monotone mapping B is -Lipschitzian.

(5) A mapping T : C C is called nonexpansive if ∥ Tx - Ty ∥≤∥ x - y ∥ for all x, y C. Next, we denote by Fix(T) the set of fixed point of T.

(6) A mapping f : C C is said to be contraction if there exists a coefficient α ∈ (0, 1) such that

(7) A set-valued mapping U : H → 2H is called monotone if for all x, y H, f Ux and g Uy imply 〈x - y, f - g〉 ≥ 0.

(8) A monotone mapping U : H → 2H is maximal if the graph G(U) of U is not properly contained in the graph of any other monotone mapping.

It is known that a monotone mapping U is maximal if and only if for (x, f) ∈ H × H, 〈x - y, f - g〉 ≤ 0 for every (y, g) ∈ G(U) implies that f Ux. Let B be a monotone mapping of C into H and let NCx be the normal cone to C at x C, that is, NCx = {y H : 〈x - z, y〉 ≤ 0, ∀z C} and define

Then U is the maximal monotone and 0 ∈ Ux if and only if x ∈ VI(C, B); see [1].

Let F be a bi-function of C×C into ℝ, where ℝ is the set of real numbers. The equilibrium problem for F : C × C → ℝ is to determine its equilibrium points, i.e the set

Let be a family of bi-functions from C × C into ℝ. The system of equilibrium problems for is to determine common equilibrium points for , i.e the set

(3)

Numerous problems in physics, optimization, and economics reduce into finding some element of EP(F). Some method have been proposed to solve the equilibrium problem; see, for instance [2-5]. The formulation (3), extend this formalism to systems of such problems, covering in particular various forms of feasibility problems [6,7].

Given any r > 0 the operator defined by

is called the resolvent of F, see [3]. It is shown [3] that under suitable hypotheses on F (to be stated precisely in Sect. 2), is single- valued and firmly nonexpansive and

satisfies

Using this result, in 2007, Yao et al. [8], proposed the following explicit scheme with respect to W-mappings for an infinite family of nonexpansive mappings:

(4)

They proved that if the sequences {αn}, {βn}, {γn} and {rn} of parameters satisfy appropriate conditions, then, the sequences {xn} and both converge strongly to the unique , where . Their results extend and improve the corresponding results announced by Combettes and Hirstoaga [3] and Takahashi and Takahashi [5].

Very recently, Jitpeera et al. [9], introduced the iterative scheme based on viscosity and Cesàro mean

where B : C H is β-inverse strongly monotone, φ: C → ℝ ∪ {∞} is a proper lower semi-continuous and convex function, Ti : C C is a nonexpansive mapping for all i = 1, 2, ..., n, {αn}, {βn}, {δn} ⊂ (0, 1), {λn} ⊂ (0, 2β) and {rn} ⊂ (0, ∞) satisfy the following conditions

(i) limn→∞ αn = 0, ,

(ii) limn→∞ δn = 0

(iii) 0 < lim infn→∞ βn ≤ lim supn→∞ βn < 1.

(iv) {λn} ⊂ [a, b] ⊂ (0, 2β) and lim infn→∞ | λn+1 - λn |= 0,

(v) lim infn→∞ rn > 0 and lim infn→∞ | rn+1 - rn |= 0.

They show that if is nonempty, then the sequence {xn} converges strongly to the z = Pθ(I - A + γf )z which is the unique solution of the variational inequality

In this paper, motivated and inspired by Yao et al. [8,10-15], Lau et al. [16], Jitpeera et al. [9], Kangtunyakarn [17] and Kim [18], Atsushiba and Takahashi [19], Saeidi [20], Piri [21-23] and Piri and Badali [24], we introduce the following iterative scheme for finding a common element of the set of solutions for a system of equilibrium problems for a family of equilibrium bi-functions, systems of variational inequalities, the set of common fixed points for an infinite family ψ = {Ti, i = 1, 2, ...} of nonexpansive mappings and a left amenable semigroup φ = {Tt : t S} of nonexpansive mappings, with respect to W-mappings and a left regular sequence {μn} of means defined on an appropriate space of bounded real-valued functions of the semigroup

(5)

where A: C H be β-inverse monotone map and B : C H be δ-inverse monotone map. We prove that under mild assumptions on parameters like that in Yao et al. [8], the sequences {xn} and converge strongly to , where .

Compared to the similar works, our results have the merit of studying the solutions of systems of equilibrium problems, systems of variational inequalities and fixed point problems of amenable semigroup of nonexpansive mappings. Consequence for nonnegative integer numbers is also presented.

### 2. Preliminaries

Let S be a semigroup and let B(S) be the space of all bounded real valued functions defined on S with supremum norm. For s S and f B(S), we define elements lsf and rsf in B(S) by

Let X be a subspace of B(S) containing 1 and let X* be its topological dual. An element μ of X* is said to be a mean on X if ∥ μ ∥ = μ(1) = 1. We often write μt(f(t)) instead of μ(f) for μ X* and f X. Let X be left invariant (respectively right invariant), i.e., ls(X) ⊂ X (respectively rs(X) ⊂ X) for each s S. A mean μ on X is said to be left invariant (respectively right invariant) if μ(lsf) = μ(f) (respectively μ(rsf) = μ(f)) for each s S and f X. X is said to be left (respectively right) amenable if X has a left (respectively right) invariant mean. X is amenable if X is both left and right amenable. As is well known, B(S) is amenable when S is a commutative semigroup, see [25]. A net {μα} of means on X is said to be strongly left regular if

for each s S, where is the adjoint operator of ls.

Let S be a semigroup and let C be a nonempty closed and convex subset of a reflexive Banach space E. A family φ = {Tt : t S} of mapping from C into itself is said to be a nonexpansive semigroup on C if Tt is nonexpansive and Tts = TtTs for each t, s S. By Fix(φ) we denote the set of common fixed points of φ, i.e.

Lemma 2.1. [25]Let S be a semigroup and C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a reflexive Banach space E. Let φ = {Tt : t S} be a nonexpansive semigroup on H such that {Ttx : t S} is bounded for some x C, let X be a subspace of B(S) such that 1 ∈ X and the mapping t → 〈Ttx, y*〉 is an element of X for each x C and y* ∈ E*, and μ is a mean on X. If we write Tμx instead of ∫ Ttxdμ(t), then the followings hold.

(i) Tμ is nonexpansive mapping from C into C.

(ii) Tμx = x for each x Fix(φ).

(iii) for each x C.

Let C be a nonempty subset of a Hilbert space H and T : C H a mapping. Then T is said to be demiclosed at v H if, for any sequence {xn} in C, the following implication holds:

where → (respectively ⇀) denotes strong (respectively weak) convergence.

Lemma 2.2. [26]Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space H and suppose that T : C H is nonexpansive. then, the mapping I - T is demiclosed at zero.

Lemma 2.3. [27]For a given x H, y C,

It is well known that PC is a firmly nonexpansive mapping of H onto C and satisfies

(6)

Moreover, PC is characterized by the following properties: PCx C and for all x H, y C,

(7)

It is easy to see that (7) is equivalent to the following inequality

(8)

Using Lemma 2.3, one can see that the variational inequality (1) is equivalent to a fixed point problem. It is easy to see that the following is true:

(9)

Lemma 2.4. [28]Let {xn} and {yn} be bounded sequences in a Banach space E and let {αn} be a sequence in [0, 1] with . Suppose xn+1 = αnxn+(1-αn)yn for all integers n ≥ 0 and

Then, .

Let F : C × C → ℝ be a bi-function. Given any r > 0, the operator defined by

is called the resolvent of F, see [3]. The equilibrium problem for F is to determine its equilibrium points, i.e., the set

Let be a family of bi-functions from C × C into ℝ. The system of equilibrium problems for is to determine common equilibrium points for . i.e, the set

Lemma 2.5. [3]Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of H and F : C × C → ℝ satisfy

(A1) F (x, x) = 0 for all x C,

(A2) F is monotone, i.e, F(x, y) + F(y, x) ≤ 0 for all x, y C,

(A3) for all x, y, z C, limt→0 F(tz + (1 - t)x, y) ≤ F (x, y),

(A4) for all x C, y F(x, y) is convex and lower semi-continuous.

Given r > 0, define the operator , the resolvent of F, by

Then,

(1) is single valued,

(2) is firmly nonexpansive, i.e, for all x, y H,

(3) ,

(4) EP(F) is closed and convex.

Let T1, T2, ... be an infinite family of mappings of C into itself and let λ1, λ2, ... be a real numbers such that 0 ≤ λi < 1 for every i ∈ ℕ. For any n ∈ ℕ, define a mapping Wn of C into C as follows:

(10)

Such a mapping Wn is called the W-mapping generated by T1, T2, ..., Tn and λ1, λ2, ..., λn.

Lemma 2.6. [29]Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space H, {Ti : C C} be an infinite family of nonexpansive mappings with , {λi} be a real sequence such that 0 < λi b < 1, ∀i ≥ 1. Then

(1) Wn is nonexpansive and for each n ≥ 1,

(2) for each x C and for each positive integer j, the limit limn→∞ Un,j exists.

(3) The mapping W : C C defined by

is a nonexpansive mapping satisfying and it is called the W-mapping generated by T1, T2, ... and λ1, λ2, ....

Lemma 2.7. [30]Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a Hilbert space H, {Ti : C C} be a countable family of nonexpansive mappings with ,{λi} be a real sequence such that 0 < λi b < 1, ∀i ≥ 1. If D is any bounded subset of C, then

Lemma 2.8. [31]Let {an} be a sequence of nonnegative real numbers such that

where {bn} and {cn} are sequences of real numbers satisfying the following conditions:

(i) {bn} ⊂ [0, 1], ,

(ii) either or .

Then, .

Lemma 2.9. [32]Let (E, 〈., .〉) be an inner product space. Then for all x, y, z E and α, β, γ, ∈ [0, 1] such that α + β + γ = 1, we have

Notation Throughout the rest of this paper the open ball of radius r centered at 0 is denoted by Br. For a subset A of H we denote by the closed convex hull of A. For ε > 0 and a mapping T : D H, we let Fϵ(T; D) be the set of ϵ-approximate fixed points of T, i.e., Fϵ(T ; D) = {x D :∥ x - Tx ∥ ≤ ϵ}. Weak convergence is denoted by ⇀ and strong convergence is denoted by →.

### 3. Strong convergence

Theorem 3.1. Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space H, A: C H a β-inverse strongly monotone, B : C H a γ-inverse strongly monotone, S a semigroup and φ = {Tt : t S} be a nonexpansive semigroup from C into C such that . Let X be a left invariant subspace of B(S) such that 1 ∈ X, and the function t → 〈Ttx, yis an element of X for each x C and y H, {μn} a left regular sequence of means on X such that limn→∞ μn+1 - μn∥ = 0. Let be a finite family of bi-functions from C × C into which satisfy (A1)-(A4) and an infinite family of nonexpansive mappings of C into C such that for each i ∈ ℕ and . Let {αn}, {βn}, {γn} and {ηn} be a sequences in (0, 1). Let {ζn} a sequence in (0, 2β), {δn} a sequence in (0, 2γ), be sequences in (0, ∞) and {λn} a sequence of real numbers such that 0 < λn b < 1. Assume that,

(B1) limn→∞ ηn = η ∈ (0, 1), limn→∞ αn = 0 and ,

(B2) 0 < lim infn→∞ βn ≤ lim supn→∞ βn < 1,

(B3) αn + βn + γn = 1,

(B4) limn→∞ | ζn+1 - ζn |= limn→∞ | δn+1 - δn |= 0,

(B5) lim infn→∞ rk,n > 0 and limn→∞ (rk,n+1 - rk,n) = 0 for k ∈ {1, 2, · · ·, M}.

Let f be a contraction of C into itself with coefficient α ∈ (0, 1) and given x1 C arbitrarily. If the sequences {xn}, {yn} and {zn} are generated iteratively by x1 C and

(11)

then, the sequences {xn}, {yn} and converge strongly to , which is the unique solution of the system of variational inequalities:

Proof. Since A is a β-inverse strongly monotone map, for any x, y C, we have

It follows that

(12)

Since B is a β-inverse strongly monotone map, repeating the same argument as above, we can deduce that

(13)

Let , in the context of the variational inequality problem the characterization of projection (9) implies that p = PC(p - ζnAp) and p = PC(p - δnBp). Using (12) and (13), we get

(14)

By taking vn = PC(zn - ζnAzn), wn = PC(zn - δnBzn) and for k ∈ {1, 2, ..., M} and for all n ∈ ℕ, we shall equivalently write scheme (11) as follows:

We shall divide the proof into several steps.

Step 1. The sequence {xn} is bounded.

Proof of Step 1. Let . Since for each k ∈ {1, 2, ..., M}, is nonexpansive we have

(15)

Thus, by Lemmas 2.1, 2.5 and (14), we have

By induction,

Step 2. Let {un} be a bounded sequence in H. Then

(16)

for every k ∈ {1, 2, ..., M}.

Proof of Step 2. This assertion is proved in [27, Step 2].

Step 3. Let {un} be a bounded sequence in H. Then

This assertion is proved in [21, Step 3].

Step 4. limn→∞ xn+1 - xn ∥ = 0.

Proof of Step 4. Setting xn+1 = βnxn + (1 - βn)tn for all n ≥ 1, we have

Therefore, we have

On the other hand

Observing that , and we get

(17)

and

(18)

Take y = zn+1 in (17) and y = zn in (18), by using (A2), it follows that

and hence

Thus, we have

Since vn = PC(zn - ζnAzn) and wn = PC(zn - δnBzn), it follows from the definition of {yn} that

Therefore,

This together with conditions (B1), (B4), Steps 2 and 3 imply that

Hence by Lemma 2.4, we obtain limn→∞ tn - xn ∥ = 0. Consequently,

Step 5. , ∀k ∈ {0, 1, 2, ..., M - 1}.

Proof of Step 5. Let and k ∈ {1, 2, ..., M - 1}. Since is firmly nonexpansive, we obtain

It follows that

(19)

Using Lemma 2.9, (14) and (19), we obtain

Then, we have

It is easily seen that lim infn→∞ γn > 0. So we have

Step 6. .

Proof of Step 6. Observe that

hence

It follows from conditions (B1), (B2) and Step 4, that

Step 7. limn→∞ xn - Ttxn ∥ = 0, for all t S.

Proof of Step 7. Let and set and D = {y H : ∥ y - p ∥ ≤ M0}, we remark that D is bounded closed convex set, {yn} ⊂ D and it is invariant under , φ and Wn for all n ∈ ℕ. We will show that

(20)

Let ϵ > 0. By [33, Theorem 1.2], there exists δ > 0 such that

(21)

Also by [33, Corollary 1.1], there exists a natural number N such that

(22)

for all t, s S and y D. Let t S. Since {μn} is strongly left regular, there exists N0 ∈ ℕ such that for n N0 and i = 1, 2, ..., N. Then, we have

(23)

By Lemma 2.1 we have

(24)

It follows from (21), (22), (23) and (24) that

for all y D and n N0. Therefore,

Since ϵ > 0 is arbitrary, we get (20).

Let t S and ϵ > 0. Then, there exists δ > 0, which satisfies (21). From condition (B1), (20) and Step 6, there exists N1 ∈ ℕ such that , for all y D and for all n N1. We note that

for all n N1. Therefore, we have

for all n N1. This shows that

Since ϵ > 0 is arbitrary, we get limn→∞ xn - Tt(xn) ∥ = 0.

Step 8. The weak ω-limit set of {xn}, ωω{xn}, is a subset of .

Proof of Step 8. Let z ωω{xn} and let be a subsequence of {xn} weakly converging to z, we need to show that . Noting Step 5, with no loss of generality, we may assume that . At first, note that by (A2) and given y C and k ∈ {1, 2, ..., M}, we have

Step 5 and condition(B5) imply that

Since , from the lower semi-continuity of Fk+1 on the second variable, we have Fk+1(y, z) ≤ 0 for all y C and for all k ∈ {0, 1, 2, ..., M - 1}. For t with 0 < t ≤ 1 and y C, let yt = ty + (1 - t)z. Since y C and z C, we have yt C and hence Fk+1(yt, z) ≤ 0. So from the convexity of Fk+1 on second variable, we have

hence Fk+1(yt, y) ≥ 0. therefore, we have Fk+1(z, y) ≥ 0 for all y C and k ∈ {0, 1, 2, ..., M-1}. Therefore .

Since , it follows by Step 7 and Lemma 2.2 that z ∈ Fix(Tt) for all t S. Therefore, z ∈ Fix(φ). We will show z ∈ Fix(W). Assume z ∉ Fix(W) Since , by our assumption, we have Tiz ∈ Fix(φ),∀i ∈ ℕ and then Wnz ∈ Fix(φ). Hence by Lemma 2.1, , therefore by Lemma 2.5, we get

(25)

Now, by (25), Step 6, Lemma 2.6 and Opial's condition, we have

This is a contradiction. So we get .

Now, let us show that z ∈ VI(C, A) ∩ VI(C, B). Observe that,

(26)

From (26), we have

which implies that

Therefore, from step 4 and condition B1, we obtain

(27)

On the other hand from (26), we have

which implies that

Therefore, from step 4 and condition B1, we obtain

(28)

From (6) and (12), we have

So we obtain

(29)

By using the same method as (29), we have

(30)

From (29), (30) and definition of yn, we have,

(31)

By (31), we have

which implies that

and

Therefore, from 0 < lim infn→∞ γn ≤ lim supn→∞ γn < 1, condition B1, step 4, (27) and (28) we get

(32)

Let U : H → 2H be a set-valued mapping is defined by

where NCx is the normal cone to C at x C. Since A is monotone. Thus U is maximal monotone see [1]. Let (x, y) ∈ G(U), hence y - Ax NCx and since vn = PC(zn - ζnAzn) therefore, 〈x - vn, y - Ax〉 ≥ 0. On the other hand from (7), we have

i.e.,

Therefore, we have

From (32), we get . Noting that and A is -lipschitzian, we obtain

(33)

Since U is maximal monotone, we have z U-10, and hence z ∈ VI(C, A). Let V : H → 2H be a set-valued mapping is defined by

where NCx is the normal cone to C at x C. Since B is monotone. Thus U is maximal monotone see [1]. Repeating the same argument as above, we can derive z ∈ VI(C, B). Therefore, .

Step 9. There exists a unique x* ∈ C such that

Proof of Step 9. Note that f is a contraction mapping with coefficient α ∈ (0, 1). Then for all x, y H. Therefore is a contraction of H into itself, which implies that there exists a unique element x* ∈ H such that . at the same time, we note that x* ∈ C. Using Lemma 2.3, we have

(34)

We can choose a subsequence of {xn} such that

Since is bounded, therefore, has subsequence such that . With no loss of generality, we may assume that . Applying Step 8 and (34), we have

Step 10, The sequences {xn} converges strongly to x*, which is obtained in Steep 9.

Proof of Step 10. We have

Which implies that

(35)

where

By Step 9, and condition (B1), we get lim supn→∞ τn ≤ 0. Now applying Lemma 2.8 to (35), we conclude that xn x*. Consequently, from , we have , for all k ∈ {1, 2, ..., M}.

Corollary 3.2. (see Yao et al. [8]) Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space H, F a bi-functions from C×C into which satisfy (A1) - (A4) and an infinite family of nonexpansive mapping of C into C such that . Let {αn}, {βn} and {γn} are three sequences in (0, 1) such that αn + βn + γn = 1 and {rn} ⊂ (0, ∞). Suppose the following conditions are satisfied:

(B1) limn→∞ αn = 0 and ,

(B2) 0 < lim infn→∞ βn ≤ lim supn→∞ βn < 1,

(B3) lim infn→∞ rn > 0 and limn→∞ (rn+1 - rn) = 0.

Let f be a contraction of C into itself with coefficient α ∈ (0, 1) and given x1 C arbitrarily. Then the sequence {xn} generated by

converge strongly to , where .

Proof. Take A = B = 0, φ = {I}, F1 = F and Fk = 0 for k ∈ {2, ..., M} in Theorem 3.1, then we have and . So from Theorem 3.1 the sequence {xn} converges strongly to , where .

Corollary 3.3. Let C be a nonempty closed convex subset of a real Hilbert space H, be a finite family of bi-functions from C × C into which satisfy (A1)-(A4), T a nonexpansive mappings on C such that . Let {αn}, {βn} and {γn} are three sequences in (0, 1) such that αn + βn + γn = 1 and be sequences in (0, ∞). Suppose the following conditions are satisfied:

(B1) limn→∞ αn = 0 and ,

(B2) 0 < lim infn→∞ βn ≤ lim supn→∞ βn < 1,

(B3) lim infn→∞ rk,n > 0 and limn→∞ (rk,n+1 - rk,n) = 0 for k ∈ {1, 2, ..., M}.

Let f be a contraction of H into itself and given x1 H arbitrarily. If the sequences {xn} generated iteratively by

Then, sequences {xn} and converge strongly to , where .

Proof. Let S = {0, 1, ...}, φ = {Ti : i S} and T0 = I. For f = (x0, x1, ...) ∈ B(S), define

Then {μn} is a regular sequence of means on B(S) such that limn→∞ μn+ - μn ∥ = 0; for more details, see [34]. Next for each x H and n ∈ ℕ, we have

Take A = B = 0, Ti = I for all i ∈ ℕ in Theorem 3.1 then we have yn = zn and Wn = I for all n ∈ ℕ. Therefore, it follows from Theorem 3.1 that the sequences {xn} and converge strongly, as n → ∞ to a point , where .

Remark 3.4. Theorem 3.1 improve [8, Theorem 1.2] in the following aspects.

(a) Our iterative process (11) is more general than Yao et al. process (14) because it can be applied to solving the problem of finding a common element of the set of solutions of systems of equilibrium problems and systems of variational inequalities.

(b) Our iterative process (11) is very diffident from Yao et al. process (14) because there are left amenable semigroup of nonexpansive mappings.

(c) Our method of proof is very different from the on in Yao et al. [8] for example we use Corollary 1.1 and Theorem 1.2 of Bruck [33] fore the proof of Theorem 3.1.

### Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

### Acknowledgements

The authors are extremely grateful to the referees for useful suggestions that improved the contents of the paper.

### References

1. Rockafellar, RT: On the maximality of sums of nonlinear monotone operators. Trans Am Math Soc. 149, 75–88 (1970). Publisher Full Text

2. Blum, E, Oettli, W: From optimization and variational inequalities to equilibrium problems. Math Student. 63, 123–145 (1994)

3. Combettes, PL, Hirstoaga, SA: Equilibrium programming in Hilbert spaces. J Nonlinear Convex Anal. 6, 117–136 (2005)

4. Flåm, SD, Antipin, AS: Equilibrium programming using proximal-like algorithms. Math Programm. 78, 29–41 (1997)

5. Takahashi, S, Takahashi, W: Viscosity approximation methods for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems in Hilbert spaces. J Math Anal Appl. 331, 506–515 (2007). Publisher Full Text

6. Bauschke, HH, Borwein, JM: On projection algorithms for solving convex feasibility problems. SIAM Rev. 38, 367–426 (1996). Publisher Full Text

7. Combettes, PL: Quasi-fejérian analysis of some optimization algorithms. Inherently Parallel Algorithms in Feasibility and Optimization and Their Applications (Haifa, 2000). Studies in Computational Mathematics, pp. 115–152. North-Holland, Amsterdam (2001)

8. Yao, Y, Liou, YC, Yao, JC: Convergence theorem for equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of infinite family of nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 12 Article ID 64363 (2007)

9. Jitpeera, T, Katchang, P, Kumam, P: A Viscosity of Ceaàro Mean Approximation Method for a Mixed Equilibrium. Variational Inequality, and Fixed Point Problems. 2011, 24 Article ID 945051, 838.85. MR 2680251 (2011)

10. Yao, Y, Chen, R, Liou, YC: A unified implicit algorithm for solving the triple-hierarchical constrained optimization problem. Math Comput Model. 55, 1506–1515 (2012). Publisher Full Text

11. Yao, Y, Chen, R, Xu, HK: Schemes for finding minimum-norm solutions of variational inequalities. Nonlinear Anal. 72, 3447–3456 (2010). Publisher Full Text

12. Yao, Y, Cho, YJ, Chen, R: An iterative algorithm for solving fixed point problems, variational inequality problems and mixed equilibrium problems. Nonlinear Anal. 71, 3363–3373 (2009). Publisher Full Text

13. Yao, Y, Cho, YJ, Liou, YC: Hierarchical convergence of an implicit double-net algorithm for nonexpansive semigroups and variational inequalities. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011, (2011)

14. Yao, Y, Liou, YC, Kang, SM: Two-step projection methods for a system of variational inequality problems in Banach spaces. In: J Glob Optim

15. Yao, Y, Liou, YC, Marino, G: Strong convergence of two iterative algorithms for nonexpansive mappings in hilbert spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl (2009)

16. Lau, AT, Miyake, H, Takahashi, W: Approximation of fixed points for amenable semigroups of nonexpansive mappings in Banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 67, 1211–1225 (2007). Publisher Full Text

17. Kangtunyakarn, A: Iterative methods for finding common solution of generalized equilibrium problems and variational inequality problems and fixed point problems of a finite family of nonexpansive mappings. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2010, 29 Article ID 836714 (2010)

18. Kim, KS: Convergence of a hybrid algorithm for a reversible semigroup of nonlinear operators in banach spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 73(3), 3413–3419 (2010)

19. Atsushiba, S, Takahashi, W: Approximating common fixed points of nonexpansive semigroups by the Mann iteration process. Ann Univ Mariae Curie Sklodowska. 51, 1–16 (1997)

20. Saeidi, S: Iterative algorithms for finding common solutions of variational inequalities and systems of equilibrium problems and fixed points of families and semigroups of nonexpansive mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 70, 4195–4208 (2009). Publisher Full Text

21. Piri, H: A general iterative method for finding common solutions of system of equilibrium problems, system of variational inequalities and fixed point problems. Math Comput Model. 55, 1622–1638 (2012). Publisher Full Text

22. Piri, H: Hybrid pseudoviscosity approximation schemes for systems of equilibrium problems and fixed point problems of infinitely and semigroup of nonexpansive mappings. Nonlinear Anal. 74, 6788–6804 (2011). Publisher Full Text

23. Piri, H: Strong convergence for a minimization problem on solutions of systems of equilibrium problems and common fixed points of an infinite family and semigroup of nonexpansive mappings. Comput Math Appl. 61, 2562–2577 (2011). Publisher Full Text

24. Piri, H, Badali, AH: Strong convergence theorem for amenable semigroups of nonexpansive mappings and variational inequalities. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011, (2011)

25. Lau, AT, Shioji, N, Takahashi, W: Existence of nonexpansive retractions for amenable semigroups of nonexpansive mappings and nonlinear ergodic theorems in Banach spaces. J Funct Anal. 161(1), 62–75 (1999). Publisher Full Text

26. Agarwal, RP, Donal, O'Regan, Sahu, DR: Fixed point theory for Lipschitzian-type mappings with applications. Topological Fixed Point Theory and Its Applications, Springer, New York (2009)

27. Jitpeera, T, Kumam, P: An extragradient type method for a system of equilibrium problems, variational inequality problems and fixed point of finitely many nonexpansive mappings. J Nonlinear Anal Optim. 1, 71–91 (2010)

28. Suzuki, T: Strong convergence of Krasnoselskii and Mann's type sequences for oneparameter nonexpansive semigroups without Bochner integrals. J Math Anal Appl. 305, 227–239 (2005). Publisher Full Text

29. Shimoji, K, Takahashi, W: Strong convergence to common fixed points of infinite nonexpansive mappings and applications. Taiwan J Math. 5, 387–404 (2001)

30. Zhang, SS, Joseph Lee, HJ, Chan, CK: Algorithms of common solutions to quasi variational inclusion and fixed point problems. Appl Math Mech. 29, 571–581 (2008). Publisher Full Text

31. Xu, HK: Viscosity approximation methods for nonexpansive mappings. J Math Anal Appl. 298, 279–291 (2004). Publisher Full Text

32. Osilike, MO, Igbokwe, DI: Weak and strong convergence theorems for fixed points of pseudocontractions and solutions of monotone type operator equations. Comput Math Appl. 40, 559–567 (2000). Publisher Full Text

33. Bruck, RE: On the convex approximation property and the asymptotic behavior of nonlinear contractions in Banach spaces. Israel J Math. 38, 304–314 (1981). Publisher Full Text

34. Takahashi, W: Nonlinear Functional Analysis. Yokohama Publishers, Yokohama (2000)