Research

# Common fixed points of mappings satisfying implicit contractive conditions

Vasile Berinde* and Francesca Vetro

Author Affiliations

Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Faculty of Sciences, North University of Baia Mare, 430122 Baia Mare, Romania

For all author emails, please log on.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2012, 2012:105  doi:10.1186/1687-1812-2012-105

 Received: 18 April 2012 Accepted: 24 June 2012 Published: 24 June 2012

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

### Abstract

In this article we obtain, in the setting of metric spaces or ordered metric spaces, coincidence point, and common fixed point theorems for self-mappings in a general class of contractions defined by an implicit relation. Our results unify, extend, generalize many related common fixed point theorems from the literature.

Mathematics Subject Classification (2000): 47H10, 54H25.

##### Keywords:
implicit relation; contraction; coincidence point; fixed point; common fixed point

### Introduction and preliminaries

It is well known that the contraction mapping principle, formulated and proved in the Ph.D. dissertation of Banach in 1920, which was published in 1922 [1], is one of the most important theorems in classical functional analysis. The study of fixed and common fixed points of mappings satisfying a certain metrical contractive condition attracted many researchers, see for example [2,3] and for existence results for fixed points of contractive non-self-mappings, see [4-6]. Among these (common) fixed point theorems, only a few give a constructive method for finding the fixed points or the common fixed points of the mappings involved. Berinde in [7-15] obtained (common) fixed point theorems, which were called constructive (common) fixed point theorems, see [12]. These results have been obtained by considering self-mappings that satisfy an explicit contractive-type condition. On the other hand, several classical fixed point theorems and common fixed point theorems have been recently unified by considering general contractive conditions expressed by an implicit relation, see Popa [16,17] and Ali and Imdad [18]. Following Popa's approach, many results on fixed point, common fixed point and coincidence point has been obtained, in various ambient spaces, see [16-25] and references therein.

In [21], Berinde obtained some constructive fixed point theorems for almost contractions satisfying an implicit relation. These results unify, extend, generalize related results (see [2,3,7-16,21,25-38]).

In this article we obtain, in the setting of metric spaces or ordered metric spaces, coincidence point, and common fixed point results for self-mappings in a general class of contractions defined by an implicit relation. Our results unify, extend, generalize many of related common fixed point theorems from literature.

Let X be a non-empty set and f, T: X → X. A point x X is called a coincidence point of f and T if Tx = fx. The mappings f and T are said to be weakly compatible if they commute at their coincidence point (i.e., Tfx = fTx whenever Tx = fx). Suppose TX fX. For every x0 X we consider the sequence {xn} ⊂ X defined by fxn = Txn-1 for all n ∈ ℕ, we say that {Txn} is a T -f -sequence with initial point x0.

Let X be a non-empty set. If (X, d) is a metric space and (X, ≼) is partially ordered, then (X, d, ≼) is called an ordered metric space. Then, x, y X are called comparable if x y or y x holds. Let f, T: X → X be two mappings, T is said to be f -non-decreasing if fx fy implies Tx Ty for all x, y X. If f is the identity mapping on X, then T is non-decreasing.

Throughout this article the letters ℝ+ and ℕ will denote the set of all non-negative real numbers and the set of all positive integer numbers.

### Fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying an implicit relation

A simple and natural way to unify and prove in a simple manner several metrical fixed point theorems is to consider an implicit contraction type condition instead of the usual explicit contractive conditions. Popa [16,17] initiated this direction of research which produced so far a consistent literature (that cannot be completely cited here) on fixed point, common fixed point, and coincidence point theorems, for both single-valued and multi-valued mappings, in various ambient spaces; see the recent nice paper [21] of Berinde, for a partial list of references.

In [21], Berinde considered the family of all continuous real functions and the following conditions:

(F1a) F is non-increasing in the fifth variable and F (u, v, v, u, u + v, 0) 0 for u, v ≥ 0 implies that there exists h ∈ [0, 1) such that u ≤ hv;

(F1b) F is non-increasing in the fourth variable and F (u, v, 0, u + v, u, v) 0 for u, v ≥ 0 implies that there exists h ∈ [0, 1) such that u ≤ hv;

(F1c) F is non-increasing in the third variable and F (u, v, u+v, 0, v, u) 0 for u, v ≥ 0 implies that there exists h ∈ [0, 1) such that u ≤ hv;

(F2) F (u, u, 0, 0, u, u) >0, for all u >0.

He gave many examples of functions corresponding to well-known fixed point theorems and satisfying most of the conditions (F1a)-(F2) above, see Examples 1-11 of [21].

Example 1. The following functions satisfy properties F2 and F1a-F1c (see Examples 1-6, 9, and 11 of [21]).

(i) F (t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6) = t1 − at2, where a ∈ [0, 1);

(ii) F (t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6) = t1 − b(t3 + t4), where b ∈ [0, 1/2);

(iii) F (t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6) = t1 − c(t5 + t6), where c ∈ [0, 1/2);

(iv) , where a ∈ [0, 1);

(v) F (t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6) = t1 − at2 − b(t3 + t4) − c(t5 + t6), where a, b, c ∈ [0, 1) and a + 2b + 2c <1;

(vi) , where a ∈ [0, 1);

(vii) F (t1, t2, t3, t4, t5, t6) = t1 − at2 − L min{t3, t4, t5, t6}, where a ∈ [0, 1);

(viii) , where a ∈ [0, 1) and L ≥ 0.

Example 2. The function , given by

where a ∈ [0, 1/2) satisfies properties F2 and F1a-F1c with .

Motivated by [21], the following theorem is one of the main results in this article.

Theorem 1. Let (X, d) be a metric space and T, f: X → X be self-mappings such that TX fX. Assume that there exists , satisfying (F1a), such that for all x, y X

(1)

If fX is a complete subspace of X, then T and f have a coincidence point. Moreover, if T and f are weakly compatible and F satisfies also F2, then T and f have a unique common fixed point. Further, for any x0 X, the T-f-sequence {Txn} with initial point x0 converges to the common fixed point.

Proof. Let x0 X be an arbitrary point. As TX fX, one can choose a T-f-sequence {Txn} with initial point x0. If we take x = xn and y = xn+1 in (1) and denote with u = d(Txn, Txn+1) and v = d(Txn-1, Txn) we get that

By triangle inequality, d(Txn-1, Txn+1) ≤ d(Txn-1, Txn) + d(Txn, Txn+1) = u + v and, since F is non-increasing in the fifth variable, we have

and hence, in view of assumption (F1a), there exists h ∈ [0, 1) such that u ≤ hv, i.e.,

(2)

By (2), in a straightforward way, we deduce that {Txn} is a Cauchy sequence. Since fX is complete, there exist z, w X such that z = fw and

(3)

By taking x = xn and y = w in (1), we obtain that

(4)

As F is continuous, using (3) and letting n → +in (4), we get

which, by assumption (F1a), yields d(fw, Tw) 0, i.e., fw = Tw = z. Thus, we have proved that T and f have a coincidence point.

Now, we assume that T and f are weakly compatible, then fz = fTw = Tfw = Tz.

We show that Tz = z = Tw.

Suppose d(Tz, Tw) >0, by taking x = z and y = w in (1), we get

i.e.,

which is a contradiction by assumption (F2). This implies that d(Tz, Tw) = 0 and hence fz = Tz = Tw = z. So T and f have a common fixed point.

The uniqueness of the common fixed point is a consequence of assumption (F2). Clearly, for any x0 X, the T-f-sequence {Txn} with initial point x0 converges to the unique common fixed point. □

Remark 1. From (2) we deduce the unifying error estimate

From this we get both the a priori estimate

and the a posteriori estimate

which are extremely important in applications, especially when approximating the solutions of nonlinear equations.

If f = IX from Theorem 1, we deduce the following result of fixed point for one self-mapping, see [21].

Corollary 1. Let (X, d) be a complete metric space and T: X → X. Assume that there exists, satisfying (F1a), such that for all x, y X

Then T has a fixed point. Moreover, if F satisfies also F2, then T has a unique fixed point. Further, for any x0 X, the Picard sequence {Tnx0} with initial point x0 converges to the fixed point.

### Common fixed point in ordered metric spaces

The existence of fixed points in ordered metric spaces was investigated by Turinici [39], Ran and Reurings [40], Nieto and Rodríguez-López [41]. See, also [42-45], and references therein. A common fixed point result in ordered metric spaces for mappings satisfying implicit contractive conditions is given by the next theorem.

Theorem 2. Let (X, d, ≼) be a complete ordered metric space and T, f: X → X be self-mappings such that TX fX. Assume that there exists , satisfying (F1a), such that for all x, y X with fx fy

(5)

If the following conditions hold:

(i) there exists x0 X such that fx0 Tx0;

(ii) T is f-non-decreasing;

(iii) for a non-decreasing sequence {fxn} ⊆ X converging to fw X, we have fxn fw for all n ∈ ℕ and fw f fw;

then T and f have a coincidence point in X. Moreover, if

(iv) T and f are weakly compatible;

(v) F satisfies also F2,

then T and f have a common fixed point. Further, for any x0 X, the T-f-sequence {Txn} with initial point x0 converges to a common fixed point.

Proof. Let x0 X such that fx0 Tx0 and let {Txn} be a T-f-sequence with initial point x0. Since fx0 Tx0 and Tx0 = fx1, we have fx0 fx1. As T is f-non-decreasing we get that Tx0 Tx1. Continuing this process we obtain

In what follows we will suppose that d(Txn, Txn+1) >0 for all n ∈ ℕ, since if Txn = Txn+1 for some n, then fxn+1 = Txn = Txn+1. This implies that xn+1 is a coincidence point for T and f and the result is proved. As fxn fxn+1 for all n ∈ ℕ, if we take x = xn and y = xn+1 in (5) and denote u = d(Txn, Txn+1) and v = d(Txn-1, Txn) we get that

By triangle inequality, d(Txn-1, Txn+1) ≤ d(Txn-1, Txn) + d(Txn, Txn+1) = u + v and, since F is non-increasing in the fifth variable, we have

and hence, in view of assumption (F1a), there exists h ∈ [0, 1) such that u ≤ hv, i.e.,

(6)

By (6), we deduce that {Txn} is a Cauchy sequence. Since (X, d) is complete, there exist z, w X such that z = fw and

(7)

By condition (iii), fxn fw for all n ∈ ℕ, if we take x = xn and y = w in (5) we get

As F is continuous, using (7) and letting n → +we obtain

which, by assumption (F1a), yields d(fw, Tw) 0, i.e., fw = Tw. Thus we have proved that T and f have a coincidence point.

If T and f are weakly compatible we show that z is a common fixed point for T and f . As fz = fTw = Tfw = Tz, by condition (iii), we have that fw f fw = fz.

Now, by taking x = w and y = z in (5) we get

Assumption (F2) implies d(Tz, Tw) = 0 and hence fz = Tz = Tw = z. So T and f have a common fixed point. From the proof it follows that, for any x0 X, the T -f -sequence {Txn} with initial point x0 converges to a common fixed point. □

We shall give a sufficient condition for the uniqueness of the common fixed point in Theorem 2.

Theorem 3. Let all the conditions of Theorem 2 be satisfied. If the following conditions hold

(vi) for all x, y fX there exists v0 X such that fv0 x, fv0 y;

(vii) F satisfies F1c,

then T and f have a unique common fixed point.

Proof. Let z, w be two common fixed points of T and f with z w. If z and w are comparable, say z y. Then taking x = z and y = w in (5), we obtain

which is a contradiction by assumption (F2) and so z = w.

If z and w are not comparable, then there exists v0 X such that fv0 fz = z and fv0 fw = w.

As T is f -non-decreasing from fv0 fz we get that

Continuing we obtain

Then, taking x = vn and y = z in (5) we obtain

i.e.,

Denote u = d(Tvn, Tz) and v = d(Tvn-1, Tz). As F is non-increasing in the third variable, we get

By assumption F1c, there exists h ∈ [0, 1) such that u ≤ hv, i.e.,

This implies that d(Tvn, Tz) = d(Tvn, z) 0 as n → +.

With similar arguments, we deduce that d(Tvn, w) 0 as n → +. Hence

as n → +, which is a contradiction. Thus T and f have a unique common fixed point. □

If f = IX from Theorems 2 and 3, we deduce the following results of fixed point for one self-mapping.

Corollary 2. Let (X, d, ≼) be a complete ordered metric space and T: X → X. Assume that there exists , satisfying (F1a), such that for all x, y X with x y

(8)

If the following conditions hold:

(i) there exists x0 X such that x0 Tx0;

(ii) T is non-decreasing;

(iii) for a non-decreasing sequence {xn} ⊆ X converging to w X, we have xn w for all n ∈ ℕ,

then T has a fixed point in X. Further, for any x0 X, the Picard sequence {Tnx0} with initial point x0 converges to a fixed point.

Corollary 3. Let all the conditions of Corollary 2 be satisfied. If the following conditions hold

(v) F satisfies F2;

(vi) for all x, y X there exists v0 X such that v0 x, v0 y;

(vii) F satisfies F1c,

then T has a unique fixed point.

If F is the function in Example 2, then by Theorem 3 we obtain a fixed point theorem that extends the result of Theorem 3 of [44].

### Competing interests

The author declares that they have no competing interests.

### Authors' Contributions

All authors contributed equally and significantly in writing this article. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

### Acknowledgements

The first author research's was supported by the Grant PN-II-RU-TE-2011-3-239 of the Romanian Ministry of Education and and Research.

### References

1. Banach, S: Sur les opérations dans les ensembles abstraits et leur application aux équations intégrales. Fund Math. 3, 133–181 (1922)

2. Rus, IA: Generalized Contractions and Applications, Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca (2001)

3. Rus, IA, Petruşel, A, Petruşel, G: Fixed Point Theory, Cluj University Press, Cluj-Napoca (2008)

4. Reem, D, Reich, S, Zaslavski, AJ: Two results in metric fixed point theory. J Fixed Point Theory Appl. 1, 149–157 (2007). Publisher Full Text

5. Reich, S, Zaslavski, AJ: A fixed point theorem for Matkowski contractions. Fixed Point Theory. 8, 303–307 (2007)

6. Reich, S, Zaslavski, AJ: A note on Rakotch contraction. Fixed Point Theory. 9, 267–273 (2008)

7. Berinde, V: On the approximation of fixed points of weak contractive mappings. Carpathian J Math. 19, 7–22 (2003)

8. Berinde, V: Approximating fixed points of weak φ-contractions. Fixed Point Theory. 4, 131–142 (2003)

9. Berinde, V: Approximation fixed points of weak contractions using the Picard iteration. Nonlinear Anal Forum. 9, 43–53 (2004)

10. Berinde, V: Error estimates for approximating fixed points of quasi contractions. Gen Math. 13, 23–34 (2005)

11. Berinde, V: Approximation of Fixed Points, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York (2007)

12. Berinde, V: General constructive fixed point theorems for Ćirić-type almost contractions in metric spaces. Carpathian J Math. 24, 10–19 (2008)

13. Berinde, V: Some remarks on a fixed point theorem for Ćirić-type almost contractions. Carpathian J Math. 25, 157–162 (2009)

14. Berinde, V: Approximating common fixed points of noncommuting almost contractions in metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory. 11, 179–188 (2010)

15. Berinde, V: Common fixed points of noncommuting almost contractions in cone metric spaces. Math Commun. 15, 229–241 (2010)

16. Popa, V: Fixed point theorems for implicit contractive mappings. Stud Cerc St Ser Mat Univ Bacău. 7, 127–133 (1997)

17. Popa, V: Some fixed point theorems for compatible mappings satisfying an implicit relation. Demonstratio Math. 32, 157–163 (1999)

18. Ali, J, Imdad, M: Unifying a multitude of common fixed point theorems employing an implicit relation. Commun Korean Math Soc. 24, 41–55 (2009). Publisher Full Text

19. Aliouche, A, Djoudi, A: Common fixed point theorems for mappings satisfying an implicit relation without decreasing assumption. Hacet J Math Stat. 36, 11–18 (2007)

20. Aliouche, A, Popa, V: General common fixed point theorems for occasionally weakly compatible hybrid mappings and applications. Novi Sad J Math. 39, 89–109 (2009)

21. Berinde, V: Approximating fixed points of implicit almost contractions. Hacet J Math Stat. 40, 93–102 (2012)

22. Popa, V: A general fixed point theorem for weakly compatible mappings in compact metric spaces. Turkish J Math. 25, 465–474 (2001)

23. Popa, V: Fixed points for non-surjective expansion mappings satisfying an implicit relation. Bul Ştiinţ Univ Baia Mare Ser B. 18, 105–108 (2002). PubMed Abstract | Publisher Full Text

24. Popa, V: A general fixed point theorem for four weakly compatible mappings satisfying an implicit relation. Filomat. 19, 45–51 (2005)

25. Popa, V, Imdad, M, Ali, J: Using implicit relations to prove unified fixed point theorems in metric and 2-metric spaces. Bull Malays Math Sci Soc. 33, 105–120 (2010)

26. Abbas, M, Ilic, D: Common fixed points of generalized almost nonexpansive mappings. Filomat. 24(3), 11–18 (2010). Publisher Full Text

27. Babu, GVR, Sandhy, ML, Kameshwari, MVR: A note on a fixed point theorem of Berinde on weak contractions. Carpathian J Math. 24, 8–12 (2008)

28. Berinde, V: Stability of Picard iteration for contractive mappings satisfying an implicit relation. Carpathian J Math. 27, 13–23 (2011)

29. Chatterjea, SK: Fixed-point theorems. C R Acad Bulgare Sci. 25, 727–730 (1972)

30. Hardy, GE, Rogers, TD: A generalization of a fixed point theorem of Reich. Canad Math Bull. 16, 201–206 (1973). Publisher Full Text

31. Kannan, R: Some results on fixed points. Bull Calcutta Math Soc. 10, 71–76 (1968)

32. Reich, S: Fixed points of contractive functions. Boll Un Mat Ital. 5, 26–42 (1972)

33. Reich, S: Kannan's fixed point theorem. Boll Un Mat Ital. 4, 1–11 (1971)

34. Reich, S: Some remarks concerning contraction mappings. Can Math Bull. 14, 121–124 (1971). Publisher Full Text

35. Rhoades, BE: A comparison of various definitions of contractive mappings. Trans Am Math Soc. 226, 257–290 (1977)

36. Rhoades, BE: Contractive definitions revisited. Contemp Math. 21, 189–205 (1983)

37. Rhoades, BE: Contractive definitions and continuity. Contemp Math. 72, 233–245 (1988)

38. Zamfirescu, T: Fix point theorems in metric spaces. Arch Math (Basel). 23, 292–298 (1972). Publisher Full Text

39. Turinici, M: Abstract comparison principles and multivariable Gronwall-Bellman inequalities. J Math Anal Appl. 117, 100–127 (1986). Publisher Full Text

40. Ran, ACM, Reurings, MC: A fixed point theorem in partially ordered sets and some applications to matrix equations. Proc Am Math Soc. 132, 1435–1443 (2004). Publisher Full Text

41. Nieto, JJ, Rodríguez-López, R: Contractive mapping theorems in partially ordered sets and applications to ordinary differential equations. Order. 22, 223–239 (2005). Publisher Full Text

42. Cherichi, M, Samet, B: Fixed point theorems on ordered gauge spaces with applications to non-linear integral equations. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012, 13 (2012). BioMed Central Full Text

43. Ćirić, L, Agarwal, RP, Samet, B: Mixed monotone-generalized contractions in partially ordered probabilistic metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011, 56 (2011). BioMed Central Full Text

44. Golubović, Z, Kadelburg, Z, Radenović, S: Common fixed points of ordered g-quasicontractions and weak contractions in ordered metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2012, 20 (2012). BioMed Central Full Text

45. Samet, B: Coupled fixed point theorems for a generalized Meir-Keeler contraction in partially ordered metric spaces. Nonlinear Anal. 72, 4508–4517 (2010). Publisher Full Text