Open Access Correction

Fixed point theorems for contraction mappings in modular metric spaces, Fixed Point Theory Appl. 2011, 2011:93

Chirasak Mongkolkeha, Wutiphol Sintunavarat and Poom Kumam*

Author Affiliations

Department of Mathematics, Faculty of Science, King Mongkut's University of Technology Thonburi, Bangkok 10140, Thailand

For all author emails, please log on.

Fixed Point Theory and Applications 2012, 2012:103 doi:10.1186/1687-1812-2012-103


The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103


Received:8 June 2012
Accepted:21 June 2012
Published:21 June 2012

© 2012 Mongkolkeha et al; licensee Springer.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

This article is written due to a small gap in our published paper. In this erratum, we point out and fix the problem to set our existed results at the best of their perfection.

1. On the results in [1]

In [1], the authors have studied and introduced some fixed point theorems in the frame-work of a modular metric space. We shall first state their results and then discuss some small gap herewith.

Theorem 1.1 (Theorem 3.2 in Mongkolkeha et al. [1]). Let Xω be a complete modular metric space and f be a self-mapping on X satisfying the inequality

<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M1','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M1">View MathML</a>

for all x, y Xω, where k ∈ [0, 1). Then, f has a unique fixed point in <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M2','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M2">View MathML</a> and the sequence {fn x} converges to x*.

Theorem 1.2 (Theorem 3.6 in Mongkolkeha et al. [1]). Let Xω be a complete modular metric space and f be a self mapping on X satisfying the inequality

<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M3','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M3">View MathML</a>

for all x, y Xω, where<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M4','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M4">View MathML</a> Then, f has a unique fixed point in <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M5','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M5">View MathML</a> and the sequence {fnx} converges to x*.

We now claim that the conditions in the above theorems are not sufficient to guarantee the existence and uniqueness of the fixed points. We state a counterexample to Theorem 1.1 in the following:

Example 1.3. Let X := {0, 1} and ω be given by

<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M6','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M6">View MathML</a>

Thus, the modular metric space Xω= X. Now let f be a self-mapping on X defined by

<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M7','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M7">View MathML</a>

Then, f is satisfies the inequality (1.1) with any k ∈ [0, 1) but it possesses no fixed point after all.

Notice that this gap flaws the theorems only when is involved.

2. Revised theorems

In this section, we shall now give the corrections to our theorems in [1].

Theorem 2.1. Let Xω be a complete modular metric space and f be a self mapping on X satisfying the inequality

<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M8','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M8">View MathML</a>

for all x, y Xω, where k ∈ [0, 1). Suppose that there exists x0X such that ωλ(x0, fx0) < ∞ for all λ > 0. Then, f has a unique fixed point in <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M9','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M9">View MathML</a>and the sequence {fnx0} converges to x*.

Theorem 2.2. Let Xω be a complete modular metric space and f be a self-mapping on X satisfying the inequality

<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M10','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M10">View MathML</a>

for all x, y Xω .where <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M11','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M11">View MathML</a>Suppose that there exists x0X such that ωλ(x0, fx0) < ∞ for all λ > 0. Then, f has a unique fixed point in <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M12','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M12">View MathML</a>and the sequence {fn x} converges to x*.

Proof (of Theorem 2.1). Let λ > 0 and observe that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M13','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M13">View MathML</a> for all <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M14','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M14">View MathML</a>

Assume m > n be two positive integers. Observe that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M15','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M15">View MathML</a>

Since ωλ(x0, fx0) < ∞, we deduce that for any given ε > 0, ωλ(fmx0, fnx0) < ε for m > n > N with <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M16','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M16">View MathML</a> big enough. Thus, {fnx0} is Cauchy and hence it converges to some <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M17','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M17">View MathML</a> in essence of the completeness of Xω. Observe further that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M18','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M18">View MathML</a>

Letting n to obtain that <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M19','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M19">View MathML</a> for all λ > 0. Therefore, x*is a fixed point of f. Suppose also that <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M20','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M20">View MathML</a> Note that

<a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M21','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M21">View MathML</a>

which implies that <a onClick="popup('http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M22','MathML',630,470);return false;" target="_blank" href="http://www.fixedpointtheoryandapplications.com/content/2012/1/103/mathml/M22">View MathML</a> for all λ > 0. Therefore, the theorem is proved.    □

For the proofs of the remaining theorem, take the idea of the above correction and combine with the proof aforementioned in [1] to obtain the expected results.

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Professor Rahim Alizadeh for questions and comments. Also, this work was supported by the Higher Education Research Promotion and National Research University Project of Thailand, Office of the Higher Education Commission (NRU-CSEC No.55000613).

References

  1. Mongkolkeha, C, Sintunavarat, W, Kumam, P: Fixed point theorems for contraction mappings in modular metric spaces. Fixed Point Theory and Applications. 2011, 93 (2011). BioMed Central Full Text OpenURL